Re: [ietf-dkim] Last Call comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02

2010-10-13 Thread Jeff Macdonald
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Jim Fenton fen...@cisco.com wrote: 6.3 paragraph 5 has changed signing identity to SDID.  The signing identity really corresponds to the AUID.  As currently worded, the mail system is advised to take pains to ensure that the SDID is displayed for a message

[ietf-dkim] Last Call comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02

2010-10-12 Thread Jim Fenton
I'll go through my comments on rfc4871bis in this message, but will split a couple of the larger comments out into separate messages. Section 2.3, Identity: I realize this is taken from RFC 5672, but the definition is not clear to me. Suggest that the second sentence read, Identities that