What do you conclude from this itemize list (which I *personally*
happen to believe are true, but also recognize it is not exclusively
true) from a design product development implementation standpoint?
Is this a feasibility study?
I'm interesting because we are very active right now in
On 9/19/2010 8:47 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
I think these all should be non-controversial. Let me know if I'm
mistaken.
1. The overall amount of mail sent through discussion lists is small
relative to direct (person-to-person) mail or to broadcast (one-to-many)
mail.
That depends on the
1. The overall amount of mail sent through discussion lists is small
relative to direct (person-to-person) mail or to broadcast (one-to-many)
mail.
That depends on the person. In any event, how is the proportion of
personal-to-group mail relevant to any topic of the working group?
On 9/20/2010 7:33 AM, John R. Levine wrote:
do not worry...they've subscribed
-
have not produced a broad requirement for enhanced list performance of spam
filtering.
Sorry, I don't understand what that phrase is supposed to mean. Enhanced how?
Better than is generally being done now.
I think these all should be non-controversial. Let me know if I'm
mistaken.
1. The overall amount of mail sent through discussion lists is small
relative to direct (person-to-person) mail or to broadcast (one-to-many)
mail.
2. Lists do a good enough job of managing the mail that they
On Aug 4, 2010, at 9:51 AM, John Levine wrote:
I'd like to back up a minute and try to understand better what (if any)
problem we're trying to solve here. So here is a straw poll.
Assuming you do any sorting of inbound mail at all, how do you treat
mail from lists to which you have
--On 4 August 2010 16:51:10 + John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
I'd like to back up a minute and try to understand better what (if any)
problem we're trying to solve here. So here is a straw poll.
Assuming you do any sorting of inbound mail at all, how do you treat
mail from lists to
B) Use the List-ID: (or something that identifies the list) as the
primary sort criterion
Actually, Any recipient but it's what you mean by B, even if it's not what
you said.
Several other people said they sort on To: but I get the impression that's
also used as a list identifier.
R's,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
B) Use the List-ID: (or something that identifies the list) as the
primiary sort criterion
Actually, Any recipient but it's what you mean by B, even if it's not what
you said.
Jon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Universal
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:51 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
I'd like to back up a minute and try to understand better what (if any)
problem we're trying to solve here. So here is a straw poll.
Assuming you do any sorting of inbound mail at all, how do you treat
mail from lists to
I'd like to back up a minute and try to understand better what (if any)
problem we're trying to solve here. So here is a straw poll.
Assuming you do any sorting of inbound mail at all, how do you treat
mail from lists to which you have subscribed?
A) Use the From: address (or something that
On 8/4/2010 9:51 AM, John Levine wrote:
Assuming you do any sorting of inbound mail at all, how do you treat
mail from lists to which you have subscribed?
A) Use the From: address (or something that identifies the contributor)
as the primary sort criterion
B) Use the List-ID: (or
Assuming you do any sorting of inbound mail at all, how do you treat
mail from lists to which you have subscribed?
A) Use the From: address (or something that identifies the contributor)
as the primary sort criterion
B) Use the List-ID: (or something that identifies the list) as the
On Aug 4, 2010, at 9:51 AM, John Levine wrote:
I'd like to back up a minute and try to understand better what (if any)
problem we're trying to solve here. So here is a straw poll.
Assuming you do any sorting of inbound mail at all, how do you treat
mail from lists to which you have
Assuming you do any sorting of inbound mail at all, how do you treat
mail from lists to which you have subscribed?
A) Use the From: address (or something that identifies the contributor)
as the primary sort criterion
B) Use the List-ID: (or something that identifies the list) as the
B
On Aug 4, 2010, at 12:51 PM, John Levine wrote:
I'd like to back up a minute and try to understand better what (if any)
problem we're trying to solve here. So here is a straw poll.
Assuming you do any sorting of inbound mail at all, how do you treat
mail from lists to which you have
A) Use the From: address (or something that identifies the contributor)
as the primary sort criterion
B) Use the List-ID: (or something that identifies the list) as the
primiary sort criterion
C) Something else
C) The 821.RCPTTO address.
Which probably means this straw poll really is
17 matches
Mail list logo
