Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Discussion of query traffic overhead

2007-12-12 Thread Jon Callas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > The comment you quote expresses rather a different concern: that the > additional traffic associated with lookup of messages with a valid > signature which is not an Originator Signature will be excessively > burdensome. Can you explain what will

Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Discussion of query traffic overhead

2007-12-12 Thread Jim Fenton
Dave Crocker wrote: > > >> 3. Scope and scale of query traffic >> >> SSP originally was constrained to apply only to unsigned mail. The >> current >> specification applies to unsigned messages *and* signed messages >> where the >> DKIM i= domain name does not match the rfc2822.From >> domain. This

[ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Discussion of query traffic overhead

2007-12-09 Thread Dave Crocker
3. Scope and scale of query traffic SSP originally was constrained to apply only to unsigned mail. The current specification applies to unsigned messages *and* signed messages where the DKIM i= domain name does not match the rfc2822.From domain. This is a considerable change in the nature