Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Domain Ownership

2005-11-26 Thread Douglas Otis
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 10:50 +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote: > Douglas Otis wrote: > > > Sending messages where the From header field indicates the > > message's author is not exploiting or abusing the domain of > > the author's email-address. > > In that case you have a Sender or Resent-* header fi

[ietf-dkim] Re: Domain Ownership

2005-11-26 Thread Frank Ellermann
Douglas Otis wrote: > Sending messages where the From header field indicates the > message's author is not exploiting or abusing the domain of > the author's email-address. In that caae you have a Sender or Resent-* header field with a "Purported Responsible Address", or it's a mailing list, or s

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Domain Ownership

2005-11-25 Thread Douglas Otis
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 14:40 -0600, Arvel Hathcock wrote: > >> The only reason the so call "freedom" exist is simply because there was > >> no controls in place before, hence the major exploitation and abuse of > >> the domains. > > > > You are describing current practices, permitting the operat

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Domain Ownership

2005-11-25 Thread Arvel Hathcock
The only reason the so call "freedom" exist is simply because there was no controls in place before, hence the major exploitation and abuse of the domains. You are describing current practices, permitting the operation of list-servers for example, as abusive. Nope, he's not. Conversely th

[ietf-dkim] Re: Domain Ownership

2005-11-23 Thread Douglas Otis
On Nov 23, 2005, at 1:03 AM, Hector Santos wrote: This is long, but I will try to be brief. The only reason the so call "freedom" exist is simply because there was no controls in place before, hence the major exploitation and abuse of the domains. You are describing current practices, pe