[ietf-dkim] SPF/DKIM complementary failure scenarios?

2010-11-24 Thread Dave CROCKER
On 11/23/2010 3:14 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: Actually, they're complementary. In places where DKIM fails (mailing lists rewriting messages), SPF can succeed. And in places where SPF fails (message forwarding), DKIM can succeed. This assertion of facts is almost certainly incorrect. Please

Re: [ietf-dkim] SPF/DKIM complementary failure scenarios?

2010-11-24 Thread Douglas Otis
On 11/24/10 9:01 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: On 11/23/2010 3:14 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: Actually, they're complementary. In places where DKIM fails (mailing lists rewriting messages), SPF can succeed. And in places where SPF fails (message forwarding), DKIM can succeed. This assertion of

Re: [ietf-dkim] SPF/DKIM complementary failure scenarios?

2010-11-24 Thread Mark Delany
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:57:58AM -0800, Douglas Otis allegedly wrote: On 11/24/10 9:01 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: On 11/23/2010 3:14 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: Actually, they're complementary. In places where DKIM fails (mailing lists rewriting messages), SPF can succeed. And in places

Re: [ietf-dkim] SPF/DKIM complementary failure scenarios?

2010-11-24 Thread Rolf E. Sonneveld
On 11/24/10 10:44 PM, Douglas Otis wrote: On 11/24/10 11:38 AM, Mark Delany wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:57:58AM -0800, Douglas Otis allegedly wrote: On 11/24/10 9:01 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: On 11/23/2010 3:14 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: Actually, they're complementary. In places where