Hi,
unfortunately I didn't have the time to do a full review of 4871bis, but
there's one thing I'd like to draw attention to.
In the original text of RFC4871 DKIM was described as:
> DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) defines a mechanism by which email
> messages can be cryptographically sign
Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> unfortunately I didn't have the time to do a full review of 4871bis, but
> there's one thing I'd like to draw attention to.
> In the original text of RFC4871 DKIM was described as:
>
>> DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) defines a mechanism by which email
>>
Hector Santos writes:
> I would go further to suggest to remove the usage of the term
> "responsibility" from the DKIM specification all together!
>
> Why?
>
> DKIM is no position today to provide any assurance to or for anyone to
> be indemnified from liabilities.
I agree that it does not pro
Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
> I'm not very happy with the introduction of the word 'some' in front of
> 'responsibility'. The way it is mentioned now is like one can say
> 'somewhat dead' or 'a bit pregnant'.
It involves domains. For comparison with the web, how would we describe the
varying degr
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org]
> On Behalf Of Graham Murray
> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 11:51 PM
> To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Some responsibility
>
> > D
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> Graham Murray
>> claims to do the opposite. What it does provide is assurance of
>> acceptance of liability for messages which are signed. ie if a message
>> is DKIM signed, the signer cannot later claim "It was nothing to do with
>> me, it must have been a forgery"
On 11/1/10 6:01 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org]
>> On Behalf Of Graham Murray
>> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 11:51 PM
>> To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
&g
Putting on my native speaker of American dialect hat, I don't see a useful
difference between "responsibility" and "some responsibility" in this
context. In practice they mean the same thing, and neither means "total
responsibility."
If someone goes to the effort of signing a message and publi
