John R. Levine wrote: > I have to agree with Dave. This is way outside anything that DKIM > specifies, it's the "first party" vs. "third party" distinction that I > hope we have buried for good.
Bury things alive, not making sure its not dead first or trying to get rid of significant distinctions tends to come back to haunt us. -- HLS _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
