-Original Message-
From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org]
On Behalf Of J.D. Falk
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:50 PM
To: IETF DKIM WG
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Thu
-Original Message-
From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Siegel, Ellen
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 10:55 AM
To: J.D. Falk; IETF DKIM WG
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451
-Original
-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451
-Original Message-
From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
boun...@mipassoc.org]
On Behalf Of J.D. Falk
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:50 PM
To: IETF DKIM WG
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim
Pasi is putting draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 on the 4 June telechat. But...
This version has added registry entries for RFC 5451
(Authentication-Results), which had been removed from that document to
avoid having its publication block on a reference-wait from ADSP.
Only, I can't find any discussion
On Thu, 28 May 2009, Barry Leiba wrote:
3. A few Yes, adding this is groovy, messages would be good and all.
Yes, adding this is way groovy.
___
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2009, Barry Leiba wrote:
3. A few Yes, adding this is groovy, messages would be good and all.
Yes, adding this is way groovy.
+1
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
___
NOTE WELL: This
Barry Leiba wrote:
Pasi is putting draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 on the 4 June telechat. But...
This version has added registry entries for RFC 5451
(Authentication-Results), which had been removed from that document to
avoid having its publication block on a reference-wait from ADSP.
Only, I
