On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 03:15:57PM -0400, Hector Santos allegedly wrote:
> I think not understanding something does not give those who do, those who
> has put in the time to help engineer this all out, from a real production
> standpoint, the benefit of the doubt.
Thanks, you demonstrate the poin
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Delany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] scenarios
> > It is easy to state a functional "requirement" but it is often difficult
to
> > explain why it is n
> It is easy to state a functional "requirement" but it is often difficult to
> explain why it is needed or to convince people that it is essential to support
> that requirement.
>
> The easiest way to handle this is to ensure that every functional requirement
> is
> explained in terms of a detai
John L wrote:
> I still don't understand the scenario.
It occurs to me that discussion of usage scenarios should be required for every
requirement.
It is easy to state a functional "requirement" but it is often difficult to
explain why it is needed or to convince people that it is essential t
