Absent SSP (or something like it), then in the broad sense of the
word, DKIM does need some kind of reputation system to be effective.
That depends what problem you're trying to solve, since there are some
that only involve validating that the sending address is real without
caring if the sender
DKIM is operating at the message transport system.
You are confusing an operational tendency to sign and validate by handling
services within the origin and recipient administrative domains, versus a
technology that is actually tied to the handling service.
In reality, DKIM has nothing
On Nov 1, 2005, at 7:46 PM, John Levine wrote:
Absent SSP (or something like it), then in the broad sense of the
word, DKIM does need some kind of reputation system to be effective.
That depends what problem you're trying to solve, since there are some
that only involve validating that the
- Original Message -
From: John Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
Absent SSP (or something like it), then in the broad sense of the
word, DKIM does need some kind of reputation system to be effective.
That depends what problem you're trying to solve, since there