Hi Hector,
Hector Santos wrote:
I really don't like paragraph two of the introduction:
Once the attesting party or parties have been established, the
recipient may evaluate the message in the context of additional
information such as locally-maintained whitelists, shared reputation
service
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Farrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm not entirely clear what you don't like there, but
> rather than explain it might be easier if you could
> offer a better wording?
See below.
>> We even have a TOC index for Reputation but not SSP.
>> Go figure.
> We
Hi Hector,
Hector Santos wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Farrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm not entirely clear what you don't like there, but
rather than explain it might be easier if you could
offer a better wording?
See below.
Thanks. I'll let others react to your speci
> Once the attesting party or parties have been established, the
> recipient may evaluate the message in the context of additional
> information such as locally-maintained whitelists, shared reputation
> services, and/or third-party accreditation. The description of these
> mechanisms is outs
