Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax andsemanticsformultiple signatures

2006-04-03 Thread Hector Santos
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The new found unchecked DKIM junk will always be with us. And if DKIM is expected to be adopted, those new found unchecked DKIM junk numbers are expected to be high. Its quite simple: DKIM-BASE RULE: - Mail Has DKIM-Signature Head

RE: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax andsemanticsformultiple signatures

2006-04-03 Thread Bill.Oxley
. Alpharetta GA 404-847-6397 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hector Santos Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 1:04 PM To: Barry Leiba; ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax

Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax andsemanticsformultiple signatures

2006-04-02 Thread Hector Santos
- Original Message - From: "Barry Leiba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Well, first, we're still focusing on the base, which is supposed to be > done within two months now. And you think there is nothing to be learned from SSP or not engineering feedback that can help better mold the final base p