On May 31, 2006, at 5:29 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Current statement 5.1 is fine, your changes introducing a -i
requirement
bypasses the main thrust of DKIM. I signed this message/I did not sign
this message.
The location of the key (d=) clearly indicates who sig
Current statement 5.1 is fine, your changes introducing a -i requirement
bypasses the main thrust of DKIM. I signed this message/I did not sign
this message.
Thanks,
Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications, Inc.
Alpharetta GA
404-847-6397
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message---