Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 //i= parameter

2006-05-31 Thread Douglas Otis
On May 31, 2006, at 5:29 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Current statement 5.1 is fine, your changes introducing a -i requirement bypasses the main thrust of DKIM. I signed this message/I did not sign this message. The location of the key (d=) clearly indicates who sig

RE: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 //i= parameter

2006-05-31 Thread Bill.Oxley
Current statement 5.1 is fine, your changes introducing a -i requirement bypasses the main thrust of DKIM. I signed this message/I did not sign this message. Thanks, Bill Oxley Messaging Engineer Cox Communications, Inc. Alpharetta GA 404-847-6397 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message---