>Yes, this sure looks like it. I suggest changing default to ...
PLEASE leave the list setup alone.
I can assure you from experience that whenever you make a config
change, within a matter of minutes you get complaints from people
assuring you that every list in the world is set up the other way,
: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] list config, was Admilistrivia question
>Yes, this sure looks like it. I suggest changing default to ...
PLEASE leave the list setup alone.
I can assure you from experience that whenever you make a config
change, within a matter of minutes you
PLEASE leave the list setup alone.
fear not.
d/
___
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org
ocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] list config, was Admilistrivia question
>
> > PLEASE leave the list setup alone.
> >
>
> fear not.
>
> d/
> _
Either that or add DKIM support and resign the broken DKIM signed messages
on the list.
Once there is a DKIM standard, having the list sign messages is a swell
idea. Until then, we'll leave the list alone.
Regards,
John Levine, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
Dum
tor Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] list config, was Admilistrivia question
> > Either that or add DKIM support and resign the broken DKIM signed
messages
> > on the list.
>
> O
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] list config, was Admilistrivia question
Either that or add DKIM support and resign the broken DKIM signed
messages
on the list.
Once there is a DKIM
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hector Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> But what about the addition of [ietf-dkim] to the subject lines if it
> isn't already there? That will break signatures as well (since just
> about everyone signs Subject) but not adding
On October 19, 2005 at 15:13, "Hector Santos" wrote:
> 1) The signer can use the z= tags to save the header signing data.
Unfortunately, the verification algorithm, as it is currently designed,
does nothing with z=. I think z= needs to be reconsidered, as
I have noted awhile back (probably on ie
Hector Santos wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hector Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
But what about the addition of [ietf-dkim] to the subject lines if it
isn't already there? That will break signatures as well (since just
about everyone signs S
- Original Message -
From: "Earl Hood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
> On October 19, 2005 at 15:13, "Hector Santos" wrote:
>
> > 1) The signer can use the z= tags to save the header signing data.
>
> Unfortunately, the verification algorithm, as it is currently designed,
> does nothing with z
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hector Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> 2) I suggest all removing mail alteration to help the project.
>>
> I agree that it would be a great idea to have a mailing list that
> re-signs messages in order to get some experience
12 matches
Mail list logo
