In message <003901c142b2$63e04aa0$010a@Thor>, Thor Harald Johansen typed:
>>If I'm not completely mistaken, this is good old fashion bull. It's a joke.
correct - i guess i should have put a
:-)
for the clueless
note that given most names are of the form
foo.com
and are issued by a small n
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, USELESS SSELES
U typed:
>> Am wondering how and where the
>>webaddress mappings taking place? Meaning if I type
>>www.xyz.com in a browser and (say) this xyz.com is
>>running on 212.34.54.89, then does my Internet Service
>>Provider lookup every
a node might be simpler but the system composed of a graph of suvch
nodes more complex - you (as switch or router vendors) might get to
make your h/w or s/w simpler at the level of forwarding, bu the overal
syusytem that manages routes and traffic might be less simple and
(therefore) more failur
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, mark.paton@btinterne
t.com typed:
>>Seems that BT cannot get it right any time!
>>Maybe someone should offer them some consultancy to help fix their problems!!
ok. sure - ask any of the UCL CS volunteers :-)
>>> traceroute to www.bt.com at 2045 hrs (BST)
once upon a time, in a far off corner of a small field
in north london, a small CS department developed a cute
x.400 mail system, that incorporated relaying between most
extant e-mail protocol channels (smtp, uucp, grey book etc)
and accomodated translation of multimedia content including
other
>>Layering ought not to be religion, but appropriate layering
>>is a good design philosophy, and strict layering may help stave
>>off entropy death of the Internet protocols. Which, judging by
>>the announcements of new Internet Drafts, may not be far off.
its an interesting thing is that t
see
http://www-mice.cs.ucl.ac.uk/ietf/
for our alternative guide to london for ietfers
now has added links on the Proms and on telephone wiring
cheers
jon
is the database of rfc authors declared under the Data Protection Act
in the UK, with the reasons and uses?
if not, i am afraid this is illegal. if you visit the IETF in london,
you might be in for a surprise
otherwise, fine and good luck and it seems like a sensible service...
In message <0c5
promising approach to modelling them...
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mahadevan Iyer typed:
>>
>>
>>Jon Crowcroft wrote:
>>
>>> In message <v04220802b77bde136984@[10.83.97.216]>, Steve Deering typed:
>>>
>>> >>We used to us
In message , Steve Deering typed:
>>We used to use "gateway" instead of "router" (and a few still do), and
i lik the fact that if you type getaway by mistake you get what people
are trying to do when they are routed ...
i also like the fact that MOST fanc
10 matches
Mail list logo