NTSC vs. PAL
VHS vs. BETAMAX
IPv8 vs. IPv6
What happens when a group of BETAMAX advocates arrive at a meeting
and discover that the host of the meeting supplies them with a VHS player ?
----------------------------------
> as a temporary measure I have configured tunnel to IIJ Palo Alto device.
> the IPv6 prefix for the meeting room is 3ffe:507:1ff::/64.
>
> it would be, of course, better to have ipv6 prefix from microsoft
> research :-)
today we've got a router operated by MS research guys, using 6to4.
so my router have went away.
2002:836b:2505:5::/64
----------------------------------
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12213.html
2002:<IPv4>:0000:<IPv8> vs. 3FFE:<IPv6>
...more TLDs....more address spaces.....more freedom...
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 1:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPv6 @ interim meeting
> as a temporary measure I have configured tunnel to IIJ Palo Alto device.
> the IPv6 prefix for the meeting room is 3ffe:507:1ff::/64.
>
> it would be, of course, better to have ipv6 prefix from microsoft
> research :-)
today we've got a router operated by MS research guys, using 6to4.
so my router have went away.
2002:836b:2505:5::/64
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Einar Stefferud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: "end-to-end" is important....Re: OPES is evil incarnate
>
>
>
> >And so:-)... May the best technology win!
> >
> >In general, the best does win, in due course;-)...\Stef
>
> Once upon a time.... there where three home video systems: System 2000 was
the
> best technology, more information recorded, better quality....but too
expensive.
> It died. Then there was the Beta system, a good technology with fine
picture
> definition and not so expensive equipment and tapes....but SONY didn't
want to
> release the patent, so the market killed it. The last one, the worst one,
the
> one keeping less information was VHS.
>
> Has anybody seen a VCR other than VHS on the last 10 years?
>
> Does the best win?
>
> Remember.... The Good, The Bad and the Ugly; Unix,Windows and MSDOS.
>
> Does the best win?
>
> I tent to believe that markets choose the one to win on every field, and
> unfortunately most times the chosen one is not that who holds the best
> technology.
>
> Regards,
> j.r.
>
>
