On Sunday 24 September 2006 09:34, Scott Calvin wrote:
> I use Eudora for email, and with the options right it marks with "hot
> peppers" messages that might be offensive. I leave that option on,
> because I find it amusing. Well, sure enough, it marked Shelly's post
> with 3 peppers, the highest r
Here is an edited version. I apologize.
Shelly
Hi Juan and John,
Here us my 2cents worth...
Unfortunately the magnitude of the FT is not as simple as a RDF. I agree with
John that the ultimate goal of the analysis is to come up with a RDF. But I
disagree about the worth of adding a bi
Oh crap, I didn't mean it like that.
SK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anatoly
Frenkel
Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 9:42 AM
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
Subject: RE: [Ifeffit] Phase corrected Fourier transforms
In the future, I r
I counted it 3 times.
Anatoly
___
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
In the future, I recommend "phase s..t" format for those who really really
hates it. It will be less offensive.
Anatoly
___
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
I use Eudora for email, and with the options right it marks with "hot
peppers" messages that might be offensive. I leave that option on,
because I find it amusing. Well, sure enough, it marked Shelly's post
with 3 peppers, the highest rating! When I looked more closely, I
discovered why:
At 1
Hi Juan and John,
Here us my 2cents worth...
Unfortunately the magnitude of the FT is not as simple as a RDF. I agree with
John that the ultimate goal of the analysis is to come up with a RDF. But I
disagree about the worth of adding a bit more processing to the spectra that
makes the spectr
