On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 01:21:58 PM Matthew Marcus wrote:
Just to put my bit in, I believe that the most significant advantage of
higher FEFF versions for EXAFS analysis is that it results in more
reasonable values for E0 for high-Z elements. I forget whether the issue
is high-Z scatterer
Some users do have FEFFx (x6l) on their own, so it would be useful to prepare
Artemis/Demeter/Larch... for them and provide
methods for using higher versions if an executable is present.
What does the multipole self-energy do? Is that the thing that requires the
dielectric response? As you
As I just mentioned to Matt, this conversation is NOT moot because a
significant fraction of users have bought access.
I wonder if it would be possible to make some sort of 'crippleware' version of
FEFF(6) which ONLY runs from within DemLarchTemis?
That might make the UW folks a little more
