On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Scott Calvin
wrote:
> One side-comment from me:
>
> On Mar 22, 2015, at 12:52 PM, Matt Newville
> wrote:
>
> N and S02 are always 100% correlated (mathematically, not merely by the
> finite k range).
>
>
> Matt is saying that N and S02 are always 100% correlated
One side-comment from me:
On Mar 22, 2015, at 12:52 PM, Matt Newville
mailto:newvi...@cars.uchicago.edu>> wrote:
N and S02 are always 100% correlated (mathematically, not merely by the finite
k range).
Matt is saying that N and S02 are always 100% correlated for a single path. But
in some sit
Hi Jatin,
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Rana, Jatinkumar Kantilal <
jatinkumar.r...@helmholtz-berlin.de> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Thanks a lot for your prompt reply. The method I am referring to is not
> the multiple k-weight fits by constraining N*S02. My apologies for not
> being clear enough
