"Debutant". Thanks spell-check!
I meant "debian"
B
On May 26, 2016, at 1:45 PM, "Ravel, Bruce" wrote:
Ernesto,
That cannot possibly be the entire screen output. If you don't know enough to
interpret and troubleshoot the screen output, then you cannot reliably edit it.
Capture everything.
That's not enough to go on. Please send a more detailed report, including
what you typed, and the complete output.
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Ernesto wrote:
> Dear all,
> after running the PGPLOT_install script, I'm trying to continue the
> installation using ./configure, and sudo make,
Ernesto,
That cannot possibly be the entire screen output. If you don't know enough to
interpret and troubleshoot the screen output, then you cannot reliably edit it.
Capture everything. Post everything. If you do not provide sufficient context,
you cannot expect me to be able to help.
It woul
Dear all,
after running the PGPLOT_install script, I'm trying to continue the
installation using ./configure, and sudo make, but in this step appears the
following error message,
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [libifeffit.so] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/erne
Dear all,
after running the PGPLOT_install script, I'm trying to continue the
installation using ./configure, and sudo make, but in this step appears the
following error message,
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [libifeffit.so] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/e
Thank you very much Bruce and Scott,
Your answers are really helpful.
2016-05-26 11:28 GMT-03:00 Bruce Ravel :
> On 05/26/2016 10:02 AM, Jesús Eduardo Vega Castillo wrote:
>
>> Just for clarifying, this is not what I have been doing. I just was
>> asked to add new independent variables (individu
On 05/26/2016 10:02 AM, Jesús Eduardo Vega Castillo wrote:
Just for clarifying, this is not what I have been doing. I just was
asked to add new independent variables (individual DW factors for each
path) while I am already at the limit of independent points.
I have been using a number of paramet
Oops, accidentally hit send before I meant to!
You might also find the information in this presentation helpful, as it
addresses some of the kinds of questions you are asking:
https://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/conferences/workshops/srxas2011/presentations/calvin_2011.pdf
—Scott Calvin
Sarah La
Hi Jesus,
Yes, that procedure is fine. As long as the final, reported, fit guesses
everything which is varied, whatever you do with earlier fits amounts to
exploration and diagnostics.
On May 26, 2016, at 10:02 AM, Jesús Eduardo Vega Castillo
mailto:jeve...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks Bruce fo
Thanks Bruce for your answer,
Just for clarifying, this is not what I have been doing. I just was asked
to add new independent variables (individual DW factors for each path)
while I am already at the limit of independent points.
I have been using a number of parameter always lower than the numbe
On 05/26/2016 09:17 AM, Jesús Eduardo Vega Castillo wrote:
As far as I understand the number of variables refers to those
parameters which have been "guessed" in the fit and it is limited by the
number of independent points.
Correct.
If I have a group of variables but only set to guess a few
Dear all,
Perhaps this question is silly but I need to clarify a doubt I have:
As far as I understand the number of variables refers to those parameters
which have been "guessed" in the fit and it is limited by the number of
independent points.
If I have a group of variables but only set to gues
12 matches
Mail list logo
