Re: [Ifeffit] EXAFS above 5 angstroms

2018-05-21 Thread Matthew Marcus
One of the biggest inhibiting factors for seeing long distances is that there are generally many, many paths, which interfere with each other so that you don't see much. OTOH, there are sometimes special circumstances such that one set of paths stands out above the crowd and you can sometimes

Re: [Ifeffit] EXAFS above 5 angstroms

2018-05-21 Thread Christopher Patridge
Daniel, Those distances are really far away and I think it would really difficult to see in EXAFS even with pretty high quality data. Is there are other information from diffraction that suggests these distances? Chris ** Dr Christopher Patridge

[Ifeffit] EXAFS above 5 angstroms

2018-05-21 Thread Daniel Sneed
Hello, This is my first time posting to the mailing list, so please forgive me if I did not do it correctly. I am currently working on EXAFS of tin(IV) oxide, and I have what appears to be high quality data out to 9 angstroms or so, but I am having some issues in fitting the data above 4

Re: [Ifeffit] temperature dependency of amp parameter

2018-05-21 Thread Matt Newville
Hi Abdul, On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 3:24 PM Abdul Ahad wrote: > Hi all, > I have little confusion that do i fix or change S2 for each data set > measured at different temperature. The compound is not monoatomic so i used > Einstein model for sigma2. What about amplitude

[Ifeffit] temperature dependency of amp parameter

2018-05-21 Thread Abdul Ahad
Hi all, I have little confusion that do i fix or change S2 for each data set measured at different temperature. The compound is not monoatomic so i used Einstein model for sigma2. What about amplitude S2. thanks *A. Ahad* ___ Ifeffit mailing list