Re: [Ifeffit] [Ext] Brain teaser

2023-06-14 Thread matthew marcus
The mirror was set up for a run at the Pd K-edge, according to the problem statement. Therefore, its nominal angle must be such as to put the critical energy >25keV. An angle of 3mrad would do it. At that angle, the reflectivity (assuming no roughness) goes up with energy in the relevant ran

Re: [Ifeffit] [Ext] Brain teaser

2023-06-14 Thread Jeffrey Terry
Well, I’ll take a shot. Looks like the mirror angle is totally fubared, you are getting Bragg peaks from the coating or substrate that are giving you the peaks in Io. Since you have no idea what angle those are going through Io, they are unlikely to make it into either the sample or It. Since th

Re: [Ifeffit] Brain teaser

2023-06-14 Thread Anatoly Frenkel
Amazing idea. I thunk you were the only one who succeeded to use third harmonic of Si for taking EXAFS at high atomic number elements. But that does not explain the peaks and dips. Anatoly > On Jun 15, 2023, at 12:22 AM, matthew marcus wrote: > > Suppose the mono is being used at the 333 re

Re: [Ifeffit] Brain teaser

2023-06-14 Thread matthew marcus
Suppose the mono is being used at the 333 reflection (for Si), intentionally working at the 3rd harmonic. In that case, if the fundamental isn't filtered out, you could get just what we see, with the sample doing the filtering before the beam gets to the transmission chamber. mam On 6

Re: [Ifeffit] Brain teaser

2023-06-14 Thread Anatoly Frenkel
Thank you, Matthew and Robert, but I think the explanation is more simplle. The fact that there are peaks in I0 and dips in transmission is a clue that explains why transmission is almost linear while I0 curves up. Anatoly > On Jun 14, 2023, at 11:34 PM, matthew marcus wrote: > > One thing

Re: [Ifeffit] Brain teaser

2023-06-14 Thread matthew marcus
One thing that's pretty odd is that the glitches are peaks in I0, and dips in It. It would be much easier to explain if It was the one that increased steeply and I0 was more linear, but the presence of the edge in It shows that you didn't switch them. Red = It. What's that sudden drop at the

Re: [Ifeffit] Brain teaser

2023-06-14 Thread Robert Gordon
Hi Anatoly, reflectivity of Pt over that energy range does not vary that much: [image: image.png] I guessed what angle you were set for, assuming Pd K-edge... So something wrong with I0? -R. On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 5:28 PM Anatoly Frenkel < anatoly.fren...@stonybrook.edu> wrote: > Hello, all

[Ifeffit] Brain teaser

2023-06-14 Thread Anatoly Frenkel
Hello, all. It is a low- to medium- level brain teaser. Pt-coated collimating mirror was in place for Pd K-edge measurement, but Au L3-edge of Pd-Au alloy was measured (for testing purposes). I0 and It detectors were both Ar filled ionization chambers. Because of the energy dependence of reflectiv