Hi Hao,
I haven't had time to look at your fits, but I have some generic
responses to what you say below.
It is typical of someone new to the field to chase r-factors. Don't
do it! I could take any spectrum and any model and by floating enough
variables, come up with a terrific looking r-facto
Hello Hao:
I took a look at your fits _very_ briefly. Just a couple of things to
note.
The range of chi(k) which you use in the fit is probably a bit large.
You are starting at 2.1 and the data at that point is really not usable.
I would start at 3 or so. On the high end, it seems OK.
The
On Friday 23 February 2007 21:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, I am modeling the uranyl ligand and two equatorial ligands, one of
> which is hypothesized as U-F (from BF4 anion), and the other as U-O (from
> hydration),because in the uranyl nitrate standard sloution(without
> MOEMIMBF4), there
