Re: [Ifeffit] Ifeffit Digest, Vol 158, Issue 3

While I am agnostic on the issue of nomenclature of the effect in question, far be it from me to deny Matthew (or anyone else) his right to a quality rant. Well done! That said, this: On 04/03/2016 10:15 PM, Matthew Marcus wrote: I might also note that although many elaborate schemes have

Re: [Ifeffit] Ifeffit Digest, Vol 158, Issue 3

Yup. In fact, self absorption, in the correct sense, can help reduce "self-absorption" in the misnomer sense! That's how the grazing-exit method works. I might also note that although many elaborate schemes have been proposed for correcting for the effect, they all require knowing things

Re: [Ifeffit] Ifeffit Digest, Vol 158, Issue 3

Hi Matthew, On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Matthew Marcus wrote: > > It shouldn't be called 'self-absorption'. That's a misnomer, which seems > to have come from a 1992 > paper (Troger, et. al."Full correction of the self-absorption in > soft-fluorescence extended

Re: [Ifeffit] Ifeffit Digest, Vol 158, Issue 3

It shouldn't be called 'self-absorption'. That's a misnomer, which seems to have come from a 1992 paper (Troger, et. al."Full correction of the self-absorption in soft-fluorescence extended x-ray-absorption fine structure", PRB 46,3283 (1992). The effect was described and analyzed in a 1982

Re: [Ifeffit] Ifeffit Digest, Vol 158, Issue 3

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Matteo Busi wrote: > Hi Bruce, > Thanks for your help, it's really appreciated. > I was trying to keep it simple but it seems I'm just messing around. > > What I am trying to do is to perform a new developed self-absorption > correction using

Re: [Ifeffit] Ifeffit Digest, Vol 158, Issue 3

Hi Bruce, Thanks for your help, it's really appreciated. I was trying to keep it simple but it seems I'm just messing around. What I am trying to do is to perform a new developed self-absorption correction using collected fluorescence absorption coefficient data on a CuSO4 (pentahydrate) capillar