: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
Onderwerp: Re: [Ifeffit] Larch-0.9.24 with Python2
Hi Matthias,
Hmm, looking at this more closely, my guess is that you're using an
older version scipy than I am. Can you verify what scipy version you
have?
That is, I do see that the return value for this call
] namens Matt Newville
[newvi...@cars.uchicago.edu]
Verzonden: woensdag 5 november 2014 14:23
Aan: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
Onderwerp: Re: [Ifeffit] Larch-0.9.24 with Python2
Hi Matthias,
OK, having scipy 0.9.0 is almost certainly the problem. I'm not
entirely sure how far back in scipy
-boun...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
[ifeffit-boun...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov] namens Matt Newville
[newvi...@cars.uchicago.edu]
Verzonden: woensdag 5 november 2014 14:23
Aan: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
Onderwerp: Re: [Ifeffit] Larch-0.9.24 with Python2
Hi Matthias,
OK, having scipy
Dear mailing list user,
When running an example file of Larch-0.9.24 with Python2 on Ubuntu x86_64, the
following error was reported.
File Py_usinglarch.py, line 32, in module
autobk(xafsdat.energy, xafsdat.mu, rbkg=1.0, _larch=my_larch)
File
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Matthias Filez matthias.fi...@ugent.be wrote:
Dear mailing list user,
When running an example file of Larch-0.9.24 with Python2 on Ubuntu x86_64,
the following error was reported.
File Py_usinglarch.py, line 32, in module
autobk(xafsdat.energy,
...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov] namens Matt Newville
[newvi...@cars.uchicago.edu]
Verzonden: dinsdag 4 november 2014 13:41
Aan: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
Onderwerp: Re: [Ifeffit] Larch-0.9.24 with Python2
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Matthias Filez matthias.fi...@ugent.be wrote:
Dear mailing list user
On 11/04/2014 12:07 PM, Matthias Filez wrote:
I included the following line at the beginning of the example you just posted
(after use_plugin_path('xafs')): use_plugin_path('wx')
and this is what I get if I run it:
Matthias,
I agree with Matt. His script works just fine for me on my Ubuntu
Hi Matthias,
Hmm, looking at this more closely, my guess is that you're using an
older version scipy than I am. Can you verify what scipy version you
have?
That is, I do see that the return value for this call did change
sometime in the past 2 years, though I'm not sure exactly which
version.