Hi Peng,
This will echo much of what Matthew Marcus wrote:
For comment 1 on S02, picking a value of 0.85 seems reasonable. I think the
reviewer is asking you to explain how you got that value. Saying something
like "we chose that value so that the data from a simple metal foil (or
simple metal
Was there a standard measured that's chemically similar to the unknown?
If so, S0^2 could be set by requiring that the CN of the standard be
what it's known to be. Often, the dσ² is mostly relevant in terms of
differences or changes so an error in the absolute value isn't very
important. If
Dear Ifeffit members,
I received the following two comments.
"
Comment 1: Authors have fixed the amplitude reduction factor (SO2) to a
fixed value (0.85). This factor is specific to particular chemical compound
and sample preparation and quality (mostly homogeneity), measurement method
(e.g.
