Matt and Matthew,
Thanks for your suggestions. I will try to collect some spectra well above
the Co L-edge and see if they provide additional insight.
Best,
George
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Matthew Marcus mamar...@lbl.gov wrote:
I don't think so. This may be a better question for M.
OK, I think the other Matt has solved it - it's the L1 peak. I was confused
by an inaccurate attempt at reading the energy scale.
Also, I somehow didn't read correctly the branching ratio from Hephaestus.
mam
On 3/31/2014 8:57 PM, George Sterbinsky wrote:
Hi Matt,
Thanks for your
Hi Matthew,
Hephaestus shows the strength of the Ll emission to be about 10% of the La2
emission. When fitting the spectrum as a sum of Gaussians, I find that the
area of of the Gaussian used to fit the Ll is 24% of that used to fit the
La2. What would cause the ratio determined from tabulated
Hi George,
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:56 AM, George Sterbinsky
georgesterbin...@u.northwestern.edu wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Hephaestus shows the strength of the Ll emission to be about 10% of the La2
emission. When fitting the spectrum as a sum of Gaussians, I find that the
area of of the Gaussian
I don't think so. This may be a better question for M. Newville, or whoever
wrote the program.
mam
On 4/1/2014 9:56 AM, George Sterbinsky wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Hephaestus shows the strength of the Ll emission to be about 10% of the La2 emission.
When fitting the spectrum as a sum of
Hello,
I am writing with a general XAS question. It does not necessarily pertain
to Ifeffit, however, I think the topic is something some, maybe most, list
members will be knowledgeable about. So it seems like this list is a good
place to post this question.
On to the question. I have attached a
Hmmm. An interesting brain-teaser. Scaling very roughly from the graph, the
mystery peak shows up at about 715eV. This is consistent with Fe.
Could there be a background from Fe somewhere in the detection systen? The
intensity between the O and Co peaks doesn't really look like
a peak, but
Hi George,
Calibrated spectra would help, but if we guess the calibration is 0.56
bins/ eV, then we'd have
line E (eV) bin #
-
Co La1,2 775 434
O Ka1,2 525 294
C Ka1,2 277 155
which
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for your reply. see below.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Matthew Marcus mamar...@lbl.gov wrote:
Hmmm. An interesting brain-teaser. Scaling very roughly from the graph,
the mystery peak shows up at about 715eV. This is consistent with Fe.
Could there be a background
