Hi Matthew,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Matthew Marcus wrote:
> Many years back, when FEFF stopped being free, I was told that the decision
> was not Rehr's but forced by the university. Blame them.
> It's always easier and more pleasant for us to blame faceless university
> beauraucrats t
Many years back, when FEFF stopped being free, I was told that the decision was
not Rehr's but forced by the university. Blame them.
It's always easier and more pleasant for us to blame faceless university
beauraucrats than scientists anyway :-)
I agree that FEFF input is broken. This was, pe
Hi Matthew, Bruce,
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Matthew Marcus wrote:
> Some users do have FEFFx (x>6l) on their own, so it would be useful to
> prepare Artemis/Demeter/Larch... for them and provide
> methods for using higher versions if an executable is present.
I completely agree that th
As I just mentioned to Matt, this conversation is NOT moot because a
significant fraction of users have bought access.
I wonder if it would be possible to make some sort of 'crippleware' version of
FEFF(>6) which ONLY runs from within DemLarchTemis?
That might make the UW folks a little more com
Some users do have FEFFx (x>6l) on their own, so it would be useful to prepare
Artemis/Demeter/Larch... for them and provide
methods for using higher versions if an executable is present.
What does the multipole self-energy do? Is that the thing that requires the
dielectric response? As you p
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 01:21:58 PM Matthew Marcus wrote:
> Just to put my bit in, I believe that the most significant advantage of
> higher FEFF versions for EXAFS analysis is that it results in more
> reasonable values for E0 for high-Z elements. I forget whether the issue
> is high-Z scatter
Hi Matthew,
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Matthew Marcus wrote:
Just to put my bit in, I believe that the most significant advantage of
higher FEFF versions for EXAFS analysis is that it results in
more reasonable values for E0 for high-Z elements. I forget whether the
issue is high-Z scatterer or abs
Just to put my bit in, I believe that the most significant advantage of higher
FEFF versions for EXAFS analysis is that it results in
more reasonable values for E0 for high-Z elements. I forget whether the issue
is high-Z scatterer or absorber. If you use any of the
common prescriptions for de
> In closing, I'll say two things. (1) Feff8 is not yet fully supported in
> Demeter -- use it at your own peril. I will
> eventually get it fully implemented, but it is at this time near the top of
> my list of priorities
*Not*. It is *not* near the top of my list of priorities.
D'oh!
B
_
This is more a documentation bug in the sense that I have not written any
documentation explaining how to use Feff8 with Demeter. What's more, I have
not completely tested using Feff8 and there are probably still missing
features. I would not expect Feff8 to work completely to your satisfacti
10 matches
Mail list logo
