All, a question on how we currently handle ports; I'm re-reading the email thread "server- & port ranges: how to handle some corner cases" (internal only at the time, sorry), where I wrote, among other things:
> if (port1 == 0) watch for all ports on a given address (range) and I can't recall any objection to this (but may have missed something, you never know ;-). in the kernel, in ilb_server_add, I see "if min_port == 0, return EINVAL". Since I never saw any discussion about what I quote above, I'm a little surprised . Also, if we let "if min_port == 0, return EINVAL" stand, how are we supposed to express "match all ports"? thx Michael -- Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
