On 21 May 2010 20:09, Visakh gokulda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On May 20, 10:15 pm, Mohamed Naufal naufa...@gmail.com wrote:
Something for the technically minded:
The first in-depth technical analysis of VP8
(http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377)
Cheers
Naufal
Thanks a lot for the link.
Hi,
On May 20, 10:15 pm, Mohamed Naufal naufa...@gmail.com wrote:
Something for the technically minded:
The first in-depth technical analysis of VP8
(http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377)
Cheers
Naufal
Thanks a lot for the link. Unfortunately, this article is not very
confidence
Finally! The news we had been waiting for! Here is the WebM project :
The open sourced VP8 video format with Vorbis audio format and a
subset of the Matroska container.
Official site : http://www.webmproject.org/
Mozilla blog:
Finally! Here is the news we have been waiting to hear! Introducing
WebM : Open sourced VP8 video format with Vorbis audio format in a
subset of the open source Matroska container.
Official site : http://www.webmproject.org/
Mozilla blog:
On 20 May 2010 20:04, Visakh gokulda...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally! The news we had been waiting for! Here is the WebM project :
The open sourced VP8 video format with Vorbis audio format and a
subset of the Matroska container.
Official site : http://www.webmproject.org/
Mozilla blog:
Hi,
Just yesterday on the sidelines of FSUG meeting, we discussed the
possibility of Google open sourcing the VP8 format/codec and the
opportunities it could open. VP8 is more than major contender against
the controversial H.264 format - the former is considered far superior
in quality and
Hi,
I really don't mind a flame war on this one - The Matroska container
is way better than the Ogg container :P
On a more serious note, the open source Matroska container format is
one that doesn't get the attention it deserves. I have to agree that
Ogg is slightly better for streaming. But