Hello,
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009, Raja Subramanian wrote:
> I've been planning on setting up a central SVN repository off-site so that
> my users can commit their changes daily, and thus do their own backups.
> And something like TortiseSVN should ease the end user experience.
As long as your users are
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves
wrote:
> I would say rsync is a far better tool for this
rsync is good only for mirroring. It offers no revision
control. If someone corrupts local data, the remote side
also gets corrupted.
For those worried about the security of your data whe
On Friday 03 April 2009 15:25:50 Raja Subramanian wrote:
> I see lots of benefits in using SVN -- multiple file revisions, off-site
> backup, reduced bandwidth usage, etc. But I've never tried svn for large
> repos holding binary files.
I would say rsync is a far better tool for this
--
regards
>
> Has anyone (ab)used their SVN repositories like this and offer any
> insights?
We have customers who use SVN to store iso images. We also have customers
with WC size >40GB, excluding the size of .svn directory. I think, using
earlier Apache releases (>2.2), we can not upload files > 2GB, as p
Hi,
I'm looking for a system to backup my office data -- binary files (mostly
MS Office documents, pdf, etc) spread over a dozen or so Windows desktops.
I have ~5GB of data in total. Unlike source code, my users rarely modify
existing files in my dataset, and it grows whenever new files are added
