Re: [Ilugc] Apple's iPad is iBad for Freedom !!

2010-01-29 Thread swamynathan
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:27 PM, aishwarya . wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:18 PM, swamynathan wrote: > > > apart from that ipad loks and features aint promising and very mush what > > slashdot.com says its a step backword in development > > > > > No top posting please.. See t

Re: [Ilugc] Apple's iPad is iBad for Freedom !!

2010-01-29 Thread aishwarya .
Hi, On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:18 PM, swamynathan wrote: > apart from that ipad loks and features aint promising and very mush what > slashdot.com says its a step backword in development > > No top posting please.. See the below two links.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Re: [Ilugc] Apple's iPad is iBad for Freedom !!

2010-01-29 Thread swamynathan
apart from that ipad loks and features aint promising and very mush what slashdot.com says its a step backword in development On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Parin Sharma wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Holmes Wilson > Date: Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:53 AM > Subject: [fsf-

[Ilugc] Apple's iPad is iBad for Freedom !!

2010-01-28 Thread Parin Sharma
-- Forwarded message -- From: Holmes Wilson Date: Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:53 AM Subject: [fsf-community-team] [HELP!] Apple iPad press work To: FSF Community Team , campaigns-no...@fsf.org Hey everyone, It would be awesome if people could help circulate news about iPad's dangerou