2010/10/6 Thyagarajan தியாகராஜன்
> Hi,
>
> >>Quest 2: What is the Goal of LUG that you are currently working with?
> >>Can i build an web app using FOSS+ adobe flex platform
>
> IMO, Lug does not endorse any proprietary software, instead i feel as a
> lugger it is worth to work for a solution by
Hi,
> Quest 1: What do you mean by this line? Is there any restriction that
other
>>Groups based on GNU/Linux is not able to accommodate peeps?
LUG seems to me a multi cultured domain, meaning people from all walks of
life in OSS world and not simply complied to gnu gpl.
AFAIK, There are people
On 10/06/2010 02:22 PM, mohi wrote:
> @Rahul and Raman: Is there any reasons why you still Do not prefer it to be
> GLUG?
I never said anything about a GLUG. I was merely saying that support of
ideology and preference for a name are two different things. I support
Free software. Whether you wa
Dear Mohi,
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:22 PM, mohi wrote:
> O
> *Thyagarajan தியாகராஜன் posted:*
>
> Hi,
> >
> > I am registering my thoughts, feel free to fire me, if you disagree..
> >
> > IMO, having it as LUG can give an accommodation to widest audience.
> >
> > Quest 1: What do you mean by thi
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Balajee wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 11:10 +0530, Raman.P wrote:
> > --- On Wed, 6/10/10, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I can accept a ideology and still not prefer the name
> > > GNU/Linux. I
> > > don't see why we need to equate the two.
> >
> > I to
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 11:10 +0530, Raman.P wrote:
> --- On Wed, 6/10/10, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> >
> > I can accept a ideology and still not prefer the name
> > GNU/Linux. I
> > don't see why we need to equate the two.
>
> I totally agree with you Rahul
>
> Raman.P
+1
Balajee
___
--- On Wed, 6/10/10, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> I can accept a ideology and still not prefer the name
> GNU/Linux. I
> don't see why we need to equate the two.
I totally agree with you Rahul
Raman.P
blog:http://ramanchennai.wordpress.com/
___
ILUG
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 08:26 +0530, sibi raj wrote:
please do not top post
> He has done so much for GNU and Linux
he has contributed to linux?
> , and you are not able to digest it :). A natural reply from a person
> who sees Linux only in economic perspective and benefit for a
> particular co
On 10/06/2010 08:26 AM, sibi raj wrote:
> .
> Note : You attack me , you attack me personally , you have all the rights to
> do so . But is you attack the ideology which I follow or the people who have
> contributed to the movement , I cant bear it .
I can accept a ideology and still not pref
Right ,
He has done so much for GNU and Linux , and you are not able to digest it :). A
natural reply from a person who sees Linux only in economic perspective and
benefit for a particular company but not as an socio-economic alternative .
If you wish please start KG Rasigar Mandram , lets s
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 22:59 +0530, sibi raj wrote:
> But when we form user groups , there are LUG's Ex,( Indian Linux
> user
> Groups) , Is it in any way wrong to call it user groups as GLUG
> or is it
> mandatory to call it as LUG ?
>
> It is right to call the groups GNU/Linux User G
Hi,
On 10/05/2010 10:59 PM, sibi raj wrote:
For your information .
[...snip...]
Subject: Re: Gnu linux user groups or linux user groups ?
From:"Richard Stallman"
[...snip...]
It is right to call the groups GNU/Linux User Groups, aka GLUGs.
Yep ! ...and my teacher also tells me that the co
For your information .
--- On Tue, 5/10/10, s...@fsftn.org wrote:
From: s...@fsftn.org
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Gnu linux user groups or linux user groups ?]
To: sibi_...@yahoo.co.in
Date: Tuesday, 5 October, 2010, 10:41 PM
Original Message
S
13 matches
Mail list logo
