Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome browser blocks Kaniyam

2012-03-06 Thread ம. ஸ்ரீ ராமதாஸ்
On 03/06/2012 07:29 PM, விக்னேஷ் நந்த குமார் (Vignesh Nandha Kumar) wrote: > I also noticed something weird. The site, while loading, redirected to some > other url and then to google home page. But there was nothing in the > history. This happened in chrome in my Ubuntu laptop and my android mobil

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome browser blocks Kaniyam

2012-03-06 Thread Vignesh Nandha Kumar
I also noticed something weird. The site, while loading, redirected to some other url and then to google home page. But there was nothing in the history. This happened in chrome in my Ubuntu laptop and my android mobile. On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Prasanna Venkadesh wrote: > Dear ILUGC and K

[Ilugc] Google Chrome browser blocks Kaniyam

2012-03-06 Thread Prasanna Venkadesh
Dear ILUGC and Kaniyam members, Today when i opened the Kaniyam site (http://www.kaniyam.com/) from Google's Chrome browser, it said " Malware Detected " as the tile of the page and the contents are: " Warning: Something is not Right Here!. *www.kaniyam.com* contains content from *sweepstakesandc

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-13 Thread Roshan George
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 12:49 +0530, steve wrote: > I don't know how to find the profile but to start two /independent/ firefox > instances you can use the command: You could do something like this to get the process id corresponding to each profile: for i in `pidof firefox`; do echo "PID:

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-12 Thread steve
Hi, On 01/13/2010 12:02 PM, Mohan Sundaram wrote: [...snip...] I did start two different FF instances with 2 different profiles from commandline and using 2 different GMail a/cs, one in each simultaneously, was not possible. Is it possible to find the profile used to start a FF window? I d

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-12 Thread Mohan Sundaram
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > On Wednesday 13 Jan 2010 11:35:18 am Mohan Sundaram wrote: > > > Does not seem to be. FF can be started with a profile but only the > first > > > > one. All subsequent windows when the first is open acquire that profile. > Is > > there a

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-12 Thread Mohan Sundaram
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Abishek Goda wrote: > >> Does not seem to be. FF can be started with a profile but only the first > > one. All subsequent windows when the first is open acquire that profile. > Is > > there any way of having two open FF windows with different profiles? I > > opene

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-12 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Wednesday 13 Jan 2010 11:35:18 am Mohan Sundaram wrote: > > Does not seem to be. FF can be started with a profile but only the first > > one. All subsequent windows when the first is open acquire that profile. Is > there any way of having two open FF windows with different profiles? I > opened

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-12 Thread Abishek Goda
>> Does not seem to be. FF can be started with a profile but only the first > one. All subsequent windows when the first is open acquire that profile. Is > there any way of having two open FF windows with different profiles? I > opened two FF windows from commandline with 2 different profiles and t

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-12 Thread Mohan Sundaram
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > On Tuesday 12 Jan 2010 12:08:32 pm Mohan Sundaram wrote: > > 4. FF did not allow two windows, one in normal and another in the > "Private > > Browsing" mode though. If I've two FF windows and swtich one to "Private > > Browsing" mode, th

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-12 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Tuesday 12 Jan 2010 12:08:32 pm Mohan Sundaram wrote: > 4. FF did not allow two windows, one in normal and another in the "Private > Browsing" mode though. If I've two FF windows and swtich one to "Private > Browsing" mode, the other normal window disappears. The other normal > windows appears

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-12 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Noorul Islam K M writes: > Eknath Venkataramani writes: > >> What exactly to you mean by prolonged browsing. Do you mean merely browsing >> for long hours? > > Take a look at this. Might be useful for you to judge which one you have > to use. > > http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/10/stories/201001106

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-11 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Eknath Venkataramani writes: > What exactly to you mean by prolonged browsing. Do you mean merely browsing > for long hours? Take a look at this. Might be useful for you to judge which one you have to use. http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/10/stories/2010011065001500.htm Thanks Noorul _

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-11 Thread Mohan Sundaram
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > On Monday 11 Jan 2010 11:49:11 am Akilan R wrote: > > >Tried 2 different GMail a/cs in the incognito mode and it signed me out > > > > from > > > > >both the account tabs giving the same message "You've been signed out as > > >you've log

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-11 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Monday 11 Jan 2010 11:49:11 am Akilan R wrote: > >Tried 2 different GMail a/cs in the incognito mode and it signed me out > > from > > >both the account tabs giving the same message "You've been signed out as > >you've logged into another account". > > What KG meant was that you could login i

Re: Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Akilan R
>Tried 2 different GMail a/cs in the incognito mode and it signed me out from >both the account tabs giving the same message "You've been signed out as >you've logged into another account". What KG meant was that you could login into two accounts, one each in normal and in incognito window. Not tw

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread S. Senthil Anand
> 2010/1/10 S. Senthil Anand > >> >> By using a separate process per tab, Chrome is trading off speed and >> security with memory usage. >> > > How is that a tradeoff?? Isn't that supposed to be good having per process > tabs? I've always been annoyed when one tab freezes and takes the whole > bro

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Yogesh
2010/1/11 Mohan Sundaram > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Yogesh wrote: > > Tried 2 different GMail a/cs in the incognito mode and it signed me out > from > both the account tabs giving the same message "You've been signed out as > you've logged into another account". > You're right. I made a

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Yogesh
2010/1/11 Yogesh > > > 2010/1/11 Mohan Sundaram > Did you try logging into the same account in the two different windows? > what site did you log in to? > sorry. wrong question. It worked for me in GMail.. Wait a sec. -- Yogesh. ___ ILUGC Mailing List:

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Yogesh
2010/1/11 Mohan Sundaram > > Tried 2 different GMail a/cs in the incognito mode and it signed me out > from > both the account tabs giving the same message "You've been signed out as > you've logged into another account". > Did you try logging into the same account in the two different windows?

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Mohan Sundaram
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Yogesh wrote: > 2010/1/11 Kenneth Gonsalves > > > on a tangent, I wonder if chrome would allow one to log in to the same > site > > with different usernames on different tabs? > > > > Usually, It doesn't. Unless you open an "incognito" window. > > http://www.goog

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Yogesh
2010/1/11 Kenneth Gonsalves > on a tangent, I wonder if chrome would allow one to log in to the same site > with different usernames on different tabs? > Usually, It doesn't. Unless you open an "incognito" window. http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=95464&hl=en -- Warm Re

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Monday 11 Jan 2010 9:11:43 am Yogesh wrote: > > By using a separate process per tab, Chrome is trading off speed and > > security with memory usage. > > How is that a tradeoff?? Isn't that supposed to be good having per process > tabs? I've always been annoyed when one tab freezes and takes the

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Yogesh
2010/1/10 S. Senthil Anand > > By using a separate process per tab, Chrome is trading off speed and > security with memory usage. > How is that a tradeoff?? Isn't that supposed to be good having per process tabs? I've always been annoyed when one tab freezes and takes the whole browser down with

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Yogesh
2010/1/10 Salvadesswaran P.S. > Firefox 3.5 and 3.6 use far less memory than Chrome, at least on my > machines. I should > have called it 'power browsing' or 'vettiness' :P > That is surprising. I thought it's the other way round. People have the idea that firefox is bloated. Is anyone else find

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Salvadesswaran P.S.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:34 PM, S. Senthil Anand wrote: > >> Yeah. Browsing for a long time, with many tabs. Firefox 3.5 and 3.6 >> use far less memory than Chrome, at least on my machines. I should >> have called it 'power browsing' or 'vettiness' :P > > Isn't that by design ? > > By using a sep

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread S. Senthil Anand
> Yeah. Browsing for a long time, with many tabs. Firefox 3.5 and 3.6 > use far less memory than Chrome, at least on my machines. I should > have called it 'power browsing' or 'vettiness' :P Isn't that by design ? By using a separate process per tab, Chrome is trading off speed and security with

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Salvadesswaran P.S.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Eknath Venkataramani wrote: > What exactly to you mean by prolonged browsing. Do you mean merely browsing > for long hours? Yeah. Browsing for a long time, with many tabs. Firefox 3.5 and 3.6 use far less memory than Chrome, at least on my machines. I should have

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Eknath Venkataramani
Thanks On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Arun SAG wrote: > I used it. Its good and usable. You can get test packages of chromium from > http://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium/ or add chromium repo to your fedora > installation. The baseurl is > http://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium/F$releasever/.

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Eknath Venkataramani
What exactly to you mean by prolonged browsing. Do you mean merely browsing for long hours? On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Salvadesswaran P.S. < salvadesswa...@gmail.com> wrote: > For prolonged > browsing, Firefox is tops though. ___ ILUGC Mailing Lis

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Salvadesswaran P.S.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Eknath Venkataramani wrote: > How stable is Chrome for fedora? > Has anybody used it? This is how it is done: As superuser: # echo "[chromium] name = Chromium Test Packages baseurl=http://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium/F\$releasever/ enabled=1 gpgch

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Salvadesswaran P.S.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Eknath Venkataramani wrote: > How stable is Chrome for fedora? > Has anybody used it? I use it to do some testing, and it is pretty stable. For casual browsing, it fares very well on Fedora 11 as well as 12. For prolonged browsing, Firefox is tops though. The late

Re: [Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Arun SAG
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Eknath Venkataramani wrote: > >How stable is Chrome for fedora? > >Has anybody used it? > I used it. Its good and usable. You can get test packages of chromium from http://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium/ or add chromium repo to your fedora installation. The baseu

[Ilugc] Google Chrome

2010-01-10 Thread Eknath Venkataramani
How stable is Chrome for fedora? Has anybody used it? ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc

Re: [Ilugc] GOOGLE CHROME OS

2009-09-16 Thread S.Selvam
2009/9/15 பிரசன்னா குமார் .ர > hi guys > is google chrome os to be a competor for windows in the commercial > space!! > Why google has decided to make it in open source > You have posted this into ILUGC,well this might be bit irrelevant here(talking about google and windows)

[Ilugc] GOOGLE CHROME OS

2009-09-14 Thread பிரசன்னா குமார் . ர
hi guys is google chrome os to be a competor for windows in the commercial space!! Why google has decided to make it in open source -- (¨`·.·´¨) Always `·.¸(¨`·.·´¨) Keep (¨`·.·´¨)¸.·´ Smiling! `·.¸.·´ பிரசன்னா குமார் .ர PRASANNA KUMAR.R 9962784888