On Friday 21 Aug 2009 8:51:37 am Roshan Mathews wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Kenneth
>
> Gonsalves wrote:
> > the best practice is not to configure the www thing at all - but then too
> > many people have www prefix as default and they complain
>
> That would invalidate your point, rig
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Kenneth
Gonsalves wrote:
> the best practice is not to configure the www thing at all - but then too many
> people have www prefix as default and they complain
>
That would invalidate your point, right? If you don't care about
page-rank (and maybe you shouldn't) y
On Friday 21 Aug 2009 7:29:29 am Roshan Mathews wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Kenneth
>
> Gonsalves wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 Aug 2009 6:59:23 pm Raja Subramanian wrote:
> >> It's generally considered taboo by search engines to serve duplicate
> >> content using multiple domains or urls
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Kenneth
Gonsalves wrote:
> On Thursday 20 Aug 2009 6:59:23 pm Raja Subramanian wrote:
>> It's generally considered taboo by search engines to serve duplicate
>> content using multiple domains or urls.
>
> is this an RFC?
>
The link should make you realize it's more
On Thursday 20 Aug 2009 6:59:23 pm Raja Subramanian wrote:
> It's generally considered taboo by search engines to serve duplicate
> content using multiple domains or urls.
is this an RFC?
--
regards
kg
http://lawgon.livejournal.com
___
To unsubscribe, e
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Raja Subramanian wrote:
> All the 3 new ilugc websites have both www.ilugc.org and ilugc.org
> (naked domain) serving website content.
>
> It's generally considered taboo by search engines to serve duplicate
> content using multiple domains or urls.
>
> http://www.
All the 3 new ilugc websites have both www.ilugc.org and ilugc.org
(naked domain) serving website content.
It's generally considered taboo by search engines to serve duplicate
content using multiple domains or urls.
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=44231
Please add
