[ilugd] Can't login X server crashed???

Hi, Few months back I installed RH 8.0 on one PIII m/c in the lab with NIS and NFS configured. It was fine until yesterday when I tried to log in (after I have put in my username and password), I got an error (The same thing also for root ) Your session only lasted less than 10 seconds. If

[ilugd] threads

Hi All, I want to wait for an event and timeout after a specific time period specified. And it should also wait upon an event, on whose occurence it will conrtinue with the initial processing. While waiting it should not use CPU cycles. I want to know how to implement this. just to be more

Re: [ilugd] SCO wants licensing fees from corporate Linux users

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:40:12AM +0530, LinuxLingam wrote: LinuxLingammeanwhile, back to SCO, any bets on when they are going to lower their LinuxLingamgunsights from enterprise to govt, education, corporates, SOHO, LinuxLingamprofessionals,

Re: [ilugd] threads

hello Gowri, Try pthread library. You can use thread concept n all functions are there in pthread library. Nikhil Bhargava, Research Enginneer, IMT-2000, CDOT Delhi The Linux-Delhi mailing list wrote: Hi All, I want to wait for an event and timeout after a specific time period

Re: [ilugd] SCO wants licensing fees from corporate Linux users

On Monday, July 28, 2003 9:21 PM [GMT+0800=SGT], Spoonman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As of now SCO is only targeting distributors of linux. And they have a problem only with the SMP part of the kernel. Normal users running non-SMP boxes should not be affected anyway I guess. You guess wrong.

Re: [ilugd] threads

Dear Gowri, For this you need to implement timer interrupt which will do the desired process after 3 seconds and continue to work where it left. yogesh On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 07:07, R Gowri wrote: Hi All, I want to wait for an event and timeout after a specific time period specified. And

Re: [ilugd] Gates minus dollars

The best thing i guess is... It doesn't bear the sin of reverse engineering done by the open-source community. however free and open the 'free' software is.. whether it is linux or open-office , they are all reverse engineered versions of 'closed' software. flames invited

Re: [ilugd] plcmnt papers

However I admit I must not discuss NonLinux issues on list bt epct that LUGgians wll help me 4 same. well atleast you realise that... !!! pls stop making use of the list, and simultaneously quoting sorry from now on ... rbs ___ ilugd mailing list

Re: [ilugd] Gates minus dollars

On Monday 28 July 2003 08:57 pm, you wrote: The best thing i guess is... It doesn't bear the sin of reverse engineering done by the open-source community. however free and open the 'free' software is.. whether it is linux or open-office , they are all reverse engineered versions of

[ilugd] Linux 9.0

Thanks for your reply to my query for Redhat 9.0 CD. Please let me know the mode of payment like DD etc.,in whose name to prepare and what place. Also ,while sending the CD,s please let me know how to uninstall the existing 7.1 version already installed on my PC, so as not to disturb the

Re: [ilugd] Gates minus dollars

I just went through the history of the s/w. It looked like it started from scratch. if you can get more info, it will be very helpful :-) generally, linux guys are very emotional about these things.. i don't want to fight either. Sijin From: LinuxLingam [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To:

Re: [ilugd] SCO wants licensing fees from corporate Linux users

On Monday, July 28, 2003 6:27 PM [GMT+0800=SGT], puneet goel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: where is the proof that SCO's close sourse didn't came from open source Linux code. There isn't. So? Are you saying that it came from Linux? Or just bad-mouthing SCO? to me SCO seems to be a frontend of

RE: [ilugd] Gates minus dollars

Ya that'd b interesting info.. In case people have objections on being put up on the list.. Could you forward them to me at this id.. Thanx -js -- sometimes i'm good but when i'm bad i'm even better $ -Original Message- $

RE: [ilugd] SCO wants licensing fees from corporate Linux users

what FSF or somebody like that can do at the moment is SUE SCO Over adopting unethical practicies, either show us trouble code immediately or pay to FSF. I really do not understand why the FSF needs to sue SCO. What unethical practice? They think they own the Unix Code Base, so they sued IBM,

Re: [ilugd] SCO wants licensing fees from corporate Linux users

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:27:51PM +0800, Sanjeev Ghane Gupta wrote: SanjeevOn Monday, July 28, 2003 9:21 PM [GMT+0800=SGT], SanjeevYou may get away with lower damages paid to SCO, but you are still Sanjeevguilty. Yes true, but wont the fact

[ilugd] [Fwd: [Ilugc] 181 attended BLUG meet!!!]

A message for all the folks who missed the delhi meet... ./zahoor Original Message Hi all, From http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linux-bangalore-programming/message/3319: For all those of you who missed it: Yesterday's BLUG meet was the single biggest one ever. 181