Re: [ilugd] error while running java on Fedora core 2

2004-08-05 Thread Supreet Sethi
U have to search for glibc 2.0 stubs for fc2. But getting J2SE 1.4 would be better Th stubs or called glibc compat something regards Supreet ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http:/

RE: [ilugd] error while running java on Fedora core 2

2004-08-05 Thread K N Jayadevan
Thanks The result is Glibc >=2.1.2-11 /bin/sh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sandip Bhattacharya Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 11:38 AM To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list Subject: Re: [ilugd] error while running java on Fedora core 2

Re: [ilugd] error while running java on Fedora core 2

2004-08-05 Thread Sandip Bhattacharya
On Friday 06 Aug 2004 11:14 am, K N Jayadevan wrote: > I had installed JDK 1.3 on Fedora core 2 > > > > While running javac > > > > I get the following error > > > > Error occurred during initialization of VM > Unable to load native library: = > > /usr/java/jdk1.3.1/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: = > > s

[ilugd] error while running java on Fedora core 2

2004-08-05 Thread K N Jayadevan
I had installed JDK 1.3 on Fedora core 2 While running javac I get the following error Error occurred during initialization of VM Unable to load native library: = /usr/java/jdk1.3.1/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: = symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file = libc.so.6 wi

[ilugd] Re: small my_linux

2004-08-05 Thread R.Vijayaraghavan
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:43:13 + (UTC), "Jasmeet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > R.Vijayaraghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What I need: > > I need customized linux kernel 2.6.x, X server with some application > > running. > > What I want now: > > Is it possible to customize my needs so that

[ilugd] (no subject)

2004-08-05 Thread R.Vijayaraghavan
Hello, What I have: I have a flash disk of 128 MB (effective 124 MB). What I need: I need customized linux kernel 2.6.x, X server with some application running. What I want now: Is it possible to customize my needs so that it can fit in my 128MB flash disk. I need some pointers. regards, vijay.

[ilugd] Re: (no subject)

2004-08-05 Thread Jasmeet
Jasmeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > R.Vijayaraghavan ...> writes: > > > What I want now: > > Is it possible to customize my needs so that it can fit in my 128MB > > flash disk. I need some pointers. > > And check out this article (http://www.pcquest.com/content/linux/104010505.asp), googl

[ilugd] Using the Reliance Fixed Wireless Phone (FWP) and wvdial to connect to the net.

2004-08-05 Thread Sandip Bhattacharya
I have written a short para on how to connect to the Net using the Reliance Fixed Wireless Phone (FWP) using wvdial. Those who are interested can look at http://www.lug-delhi.org/ConfiguringNetwork/DialUp/RelianceISP. Some collected information from the Net about connecting using Reliance phone

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: which version of Linux?

2004-08-05 Thread Sandip Bhattacharya
On Thursday 05 Aug 2004 4:36 pm, Nishikant Kapoor wrote: > Original Message > Message from Rajesh Khurana: > > I am new to this group. > I have a query. > I need to install domino 6.5 on Linux Plateform . can u plz suggest me > which version of Linux shd i go for. > AFAIK, IBM on

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: which version of Linux?

2004-08-05 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Nishikant Kapoor wrote: > Original Message > Message from Rajesh Khurana: > > I am new to this group. > I have a query. > I need to install domino 6.5 on Linux Plateform . can u plz suggest me > which version of L

Re: [ilugd] Sendmail Question

2004-08-05 Thread anil bindal
Our back end MX is a sendmail server which has relay from MX disabled. dnl FEATURE(relay_based_on_MX)dnl Also RBL has been implemented.. FEATURE(`dnsbl', `bl.spamcop.net', `"450 Mail from spam source " $`'&{client_addr} " refused - see http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml";') FEATURE(`dnsbl', `sbl-xbl.

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: which version of Linux?

2004-08-05 Thread Sankarshan Mukhopadhay
Nishikant Kapoor wrote: Original Message Message from Rajesh Khurana: I am new to this group. I have a query. I need to install domino 6.5 on Linux Plateform . can u plz suggest me which version of Linux shd i go for. Perhaps this URL (maybe wrapped) would be of help: http://www.

[ilugd] Fwd: which version of Linux?

2004-08-05 Thread Nishikant Kapoor
Original Message Message from Rajesh Khurana: I am new to this group. I have a query. I need to install domino 6.5 on Linux Plateform . can u plz suggest me which version of Linux shd i go for. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ ilugd mailinglist

Re: [ilugd] Sendmail Question

2004-08-05 Thread Varun Varma
anil bindal wrote: Thanks. Headers of SPAM emails show that emails are at times delivered directly to our email server MX record for Email server is must to act as back up in case of SMTP gateway failure. Solution being used is from Symantec. Sending mails directly to the backup MXs, instead of th

Re: [ilugd] Sendmail Question

2004-08-05 Thread anil bindal
Thanks. Headers of SPAM emails show that emails are at times delivered directly to our email server MX record for Email server is must to act as back up in case of SMTP gateway failure. Solution being used is from Symantec. regards anil On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 14:28, Anand Kapoor wrote: > Anil,

Re: [ilugd] Sendmail Question

2004-08-05 Thread Anand Kapoor
Anil, I can think of only two scenarios ! One you anti SPAM/anti Virus gateway is not blocking certain mails. If you are certain that that is not the case, then check the MX records for your domain. It is possible that you have listed you mail server there as well (maybe on a lower priority tho

[ilugd] Sendmail Question

2004-08-05 Thread anil bindal
Hi all, Currently we are receiving the external emails on an SMTP Anti Virus and Anti SPAM gateway server which relays the emails to mail server after scanning. Problem is that we still get the SPAM directly on our email server. How come the SPAM emails are not delivered to Gateway first but dire