U have to search for glibc 2.0 stubs for fc2. But getting J2SE 1.4 would
be better
Th stubs or called glibc compat something
regards
Supreet
___
ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http:/
Thanks
The result is
Glibc >=2.1.2-11
/bin/sh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Sandip Bhattacharya
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 11:38 AM
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list
Subject: Re: [ilugd] error while running java on Fedora core 2
On Friday 06 Aug 2004 11:14 am, K N Jayadevan wrote:
> I had installed JDK 1.3 on Fedora core 2
>
>
>
> While running javac
>
>
>
> I get the following error
>
>
>
> Error occurred during initialization of VM
> Unable to load native library: =
>
> /usr/java/jdk1.3.1/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: =
>
> s
I had installed JDK 1.3 on Fedora core 2
While running javac
I get the following error
Error occurred during initialization of VM
Unable to load native library: =
/usr/java/jdk1.3.1/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: =
symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file =
libc.so.6 wi
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:43:13 + (UTC), "Jasmeet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> R.Vijayaraghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What I need:
> > I need customized linux kernel 2.6.x, X server with some application
> > running.
> > What I want now:
> > Is it possible to customize my needs so that
Hello,
What I have:
I have a flash disk of 128 MB (effective 124 MB).
What I need:
I need customized linux kernel 2.6.x, X server with some application
running.
What I want now:
Is it possible to customize my needs so that it can fit in my 128MB
flash disk. I need some pointers.
regards,
vijay.
Jasmeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> R.Vijayaraghavan ...> writes:
>
> > What I want now:
> > Is it possible to customize my needs so that it can fit in my 128MB
> > flash disk. I need some pointers.
>
>
And check out this article (http://www.pcquest.com/content/linux/104010505.asp),
googl
I have written a short para on how to connect to the Net using the Reliance
Fixed Wireless Phone (FWP) using wvdial. Those who are interested can look at
http://www.lug-delhi.org/ConfiguringNetwork/DialUp/RelianceISP. Some
collected information from the Net about connecting using Reliance phone
On Thursday 05 Aug 2004 4:36 pm, Nishikant Kapoor wrote:
> Original Message
> Message from Rajesh Khurana:
>
> I am new to this group.
> I have a query.
> I need to install domino 6.5 on Linux Plateform . can u plz suggest me
> which version of Linux shd i go for.
>
AFAIK, IBM on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Nishikant Kapoor wrote:
> Original Message
> Message from Rajesh Khurana:
>
> I am new to this group.
> I have a query.
> I need to install domino 6.5 on Linux Plateform . can u plz suggest me
> which version of L
Our back end MX is a sendmail server which has relay from MX disabled.
dnl FEATURE(relay_based_on_MX)dnl
Also RBL has been implemented..
FEATURE(`dnsbl', `bl.spamcop.net', `"450 Mail from spam source "
$`'&{client_addr} " refused - see http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml";')
FEATURE(`dnsbl', `sbl-xbl.
Nishikant Kapoor wrote:
Original Message
Message from Rajesh Khurana:
I am new to this group.
I have a query.
I need to install domino 6.5 on Linux Plateform . can u plz suggest me
which version of Linux shd i go for.
Perhaps this URL (maybe wrapped) would be of help:
http://www.
Original Message
Message from Rajesh Khurana:
I am new to this group.
I have a query.
I need to install domino 6.5 on Linux Plateform . can u plz suggest me
which version of Linux shd i go for.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
ilugd mailinglist
anil bindal wrote:
Thanks.
Headers of SPAM emails show that emails are at times delivered directly
to our email server
MX record for Email server is must to act as back up in case of SMTP
gateway failure.
Solution being used is from Symantec.
Sending mails directly to the backup MXs, instead of th
Thanks.
Headers of SPAM emails show that emails are at times delivered directly
to our email server
MX record for Email server is must to act as back up in case of SMTP
gateway failure.
Solution being used is from Symantec.
regards
anil
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 14:28, Anand Kapoor wrote:
> Anil,
Anil,
I can think of only two scenarios !
One you anti SPAM/anti Virus gateway is not blocking certain mails.
If you are certain that that is not the case, then check the MX
records for your domain. It is possible that you have listed you mail
server there as well (maybe on a lower priority tho
Hi all,
Currently we are receiving the external emails on an SMTP Anti Virus and
Anti SPAM gateway server which relays the emails to mail server after
scanning.
Problem is that we still get the SPAM directly on our email server. How
come the SPAM emails are not delivered to Gateway first but dire
17 matches
Mail list logo