[Please upgrade ethereal on all distributions -- Raju]
This is an RFC 1153 digest.
(1 message)
--
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-security-announce@lis
Hi All
It is working out correctly , I got help from Brad
, in dubaiLUG with this small script
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d !
192.168.0.0/16 --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-port 80
It works partially means , it get redirected for
any IP address based request , it gets the d
My friend want to join this group. Pl. mail him the link for joining
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/13/05, Sudev Barar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/13/05, John Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Please use this thread for further discussions and
> > > don't hijack a
> > > running thread.
>
On 12/13/05, John Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please use this thread for further discussions and
> > don't hijack a
> > running thread.
> > --
> just curios , how did you know
> that I hijacked the thread , I did remove all the
> previous mails reference
Look at de
At 2005-12-13 08:28:06 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> my purpose is not to black list any hosts or domain , my plan is to
> have like this any clients giving any request gets directed to a url
Use an HTTP transparent proxy instead of messing with name resolution.
-- ams
___
Hi Saurabh
Thanks for the mail , editing the hosts file will
not work for me , my aim is to give a same reply to
any request I get , ie whatever request my client
gives , it should return with or directed to a fixed
IP address
Thanks
Joseph
--- Saurabh Nanda <
--- Raj shekhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in infinite wisdom John Joseph spoke thus on
> 12/12/05 16:32:
> >
> I think what you are looking for is someway to
> blacklist certain
> hostnames, so that they resolve to some 'You are not
> allowed to see that
> page in your office time' . What
