On 3/26/06, "आशीष शुक्ला \"Wah Java !!\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since it is not precisely defined (if defined somewhere, I don't know) that
> super user has to be defined as "root" in all UNIX systems, then why assume
> presence of "root".
>
You are thinking too hard about this. It really do
--- "à¤à¤¶à¥à¤· शà¥à¤à¥à¤²à¤¾ \"Wah Java !!\""
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Linux gurus,
>
> I've recently migrated my dad's office systems to
> Linux. And I also migrated
> their mails from Microsoft Outlook Express in
> Windows to Thunderbird in Linux. I
> thought I should should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
" ?? \"Wah Java !!\"" on Sunday 26 Mar 2006 09:40 wrote:
> As its doc says, "If no USER is given, the default is 'root', the
> super-user.", it seems that author's aim of su program when no USER is
> provided is to become super-user, but he ha
