We are running Ubuntu 5.10 / Kolab 2.0 on our mail server whose IP is
getting listed on cbl again and again. We have verified the checklist given
by cbl and observed that we are fulfilling all the conditions specified by
them but still we are getting listed. The security considerations we have
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On 08-Nov-06, at 9:29 PM, Yashpal Nagar wrote:
you can get the redhat support contact details from their website at
http://www.redhat.com/ :)
does that mean, nobody know RHEL? apart from Redhat itself. Or
there is
any restriction of discussing anything about
On 11/9/06, Kenneth Gonsalves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09-Nov-06, at 10:29 AM, Sangeeta Joneja wrote:
We are running Ubuntu 5.10 / Kolab 2.0 on our mail server whose IP
which ISP? static IP or dynamic IP?
It's static IP.
We have a broad band connection (DSL) from Airtel
Sangeeta Joneja wrote:
On 11/9/06, Kenneth Gonsalves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09-Nov-06, at 10:29 AM, Sangeeta Joneja wrote:
We are running Ubuntu 5.10 / Kolab 2.0 on our mail server whose IP
which ISP? static IP or dynamic IP?
It's static IP.
We have a broad band connection (DSL)
in infinite wisdom Naresh Narang spoke thus On 11/09/2006 01:36 PM:
1.Setup a reverse DNS for your mail server IP.
2.Remove from CBL / SBL
Any pointers to why this would work ?
Though I too am of the opinion CBL/SBL is a complete waste of time.
--
raj shekhar
facts:
in infinite wisdom Sangeeta Joneja spoke thus On 11/09/2006 04:12 PM:
mydestination = $mydomain example.com example1.com
mydomain = example.com
myhostname = example.com
Did you change these values to protect your domain or are they set as
example.com in the real server itself ?
--
raj
in infinite wisdom Sangeeta Joneja spoke thus On 11/09/2006 10:29 AM:
We are running Ubuntu 5.10 / Kolab 2.0 on our mail server whose IP is
getting listed on cbl again and again.
What is the reason they give for blacklisting you ?
--
raj shekhar
facts: http://rajshekhar.net | opinions:
Well Abhi i will sujest first check with your environment requirements. If
in feature you are planning to increase your CPU then you can go with AS ..
and then check your budget i mean company's budget.Then choose it ..
-Manish Popli
On 11/9/06, abhishek jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I
Looking for Linux Performance Benchmarks compared to other UNIXes and
MS Windows, for mission critical applications. Any pointers to
resources /publications /links? Any studies by European Union, NASA,
World Bank, Gartner etc?
anand shankar
___
ilugd
Replace the card on hardware base.
-Manish Popli
On 11/8/06, Yashpal Nagar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have a Redhat Enterprise linux 4.0 with two NICs on a DL320, 32 bit
arch HP server.
Problem is every reboot the interface eth0 flips over to the other
physical interface and then i
Hi,
I need to choose the right OS for a server of mine company. I decided to use
RHEL but is confused for the AS and ES ones. Which is better?
The system configuration will be double CPU, 4 GB RAM, etc. I visited
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/compare/server/ but is still loking for more
replies.
in infinite wisdom Naresh Narang spoke thus On 11/09/2006 01:36 PM:
1.Setup a reverse DNS for your mail server IP.
2.Remove from CBL / SBL
Any pointers to why this would work ?
Though I too am of the opinion CBL/SBL is a complete waste of time.
-- --
To understand this, you
On 10-11-06 9:44 AM, Naresh Narang wrote:
in infinite wisdom Naresh Narang spoke thus On 11/09/2006 01:36 PM:
1.Setup a reverse DNS for your mail server IP.
2.Remove from CBL / SBL
Naresh is right, we went through this last year. Setting up a reverse
DNS is the only real option IMHO
13 matches
Mail list logo