On 16/12/06, G Karunakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do flash only sites qualify for HOS ?
IMHO Not really. As long as they do work with OSS alterates like
firefox et.al. plugins need to be enabled.
--
Regards,
Sudev Barar
___
ilugd mailinglist -- i
Hi,
Do flash only sites qualify for HOS ?
like this one - http://www.adlabscinemas.com .. which says it wouldnt
work with my current flash plugin ( 7.0 r25 ), i guess maybe wanting v
8.0 .. & it doesnt have any alternate html only option..!
Karunakar
___
On 16/12/06, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sudev Barar wrote:
> > Would this work here?
> > http://www.itworld.com/Comp/1214/061215frenchhp/
> >
> > Every time we buy a laptop (and I am again going to buy one soon) I
> > find that most of the offerings comes with WIndows bundled and w
Sudev Barar wrote:
> Would this work here?
> http://www.itworld.com/Comp/1214/061215frenchhp/
>
> Every time we buy a laptop (and I am again going to buy one soon) I
> find that most of the offerings comes with WIndows bundled and we also
> end up paying for something we do not want.
not sure abo
Would this work here?
http://www.itworld.com/Comp/1214/061215frenchhp/
Every time we buy a laptop (and I am again going to buy one soon) I
find that most of the offerings comes with WIndows bundled and we also
end up paying for something we do not want.
--
Regards,
Sudev Barar
__
Amit Sharma wrote:
> My servers are still running on FC3 (from past 2 years) so is FC6 worth a
> change?
>
you do know that FC3 has been deprecated a *long* time back and running
Fedora - with its very short real shelf life, and very high churn on
updates - for a Server is usually a bad id
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
G Karunakar wrote:
> On 12/15/06, Amit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> now after the install is over.. when i wanted to install more
> packages.. their package tools failed.. unlike previous versions which
> had add/remove packages option, there
On 15-Dec-06, at 12:48 PM, Raj Mathur wrote:
>> 1. Orphan posts - namely posts that are never replied to
>> 2. classifying posts that create threads - maybe something like
>> 1-10, 10-25, over 25
>> 3. classifying reply posts as toppost, bottompost and interleaved
>> posts 4. length of original p
On Friday 15 December 2006 12:05, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> [snip]
>
> More useful excercises (assuming you have nothing better to do)
> would be:
>
> 1. Orphan posts - namely posts that are never replied to
> 2. classifying posts that create threads - maybe something like
> 1-10, 10-25, over 25
>
On 12/15/06, Amit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please share your experience of FC6.
>
> LFY has given thumbs up to it, lets hear from you what's your experience.
>
I have only tried installing once.. on my new AMD64 machine..didnt
have the amd64 dvd.. so did the i386 one.. i did
Hi,
please share your experience of FC6.
LFY has given thumbs up to it, lets hear from you what's your experience.
My servers are still running on FC3 (from past 2 years) so is FC6 worth a
change?
--amit
-
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo
11 matches
Mail list logo
