On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Linux Lingam wrote:
> http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/audio/index3.html
Same for many sites! I wrote an email to apple. Obviously, no reply!
--
Cheers,
Kartik Mistry | 0xD1028C8D | IRC: kart_
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Blog.en: ftbfs.wordpress.com
Bl
Dear All
Anyone interested in appearing for Red Hat Certified Security Specialist
Certification Examinations can appear at our Gurgaon Exam Center for the
following Exams on the dates mentioned below :
a) EX429 Red Hat Enterprise SELinux Policy Administration Exam
(https://www.redhat.com/course
On Friday 27 Mar 2009, Smruti wrote:
> [snip]
> By the way...just curious...after so many years...why are we still
> confused with the very definitions we stand to fight for here.
Because people don't understand the complex relationships between
copyrights, licences, price and distribution?
Whic
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Smruti wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Honey Singh
> wrote:
>
> > In simple words an open source application can be a freeware but a
> freeware
> > application/software can't be an open source.
>
>
> I guess you meant "May" by "Can" and "May not" by "
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Honey Singh wrote:
> In simple words an open source application can be a freeware but a freeware
> application/software can't be an open source.
I guess you meant "May" by "Can" and "May not" by "Can't".
By the way...just curious...after so many years...why a
> On 27-Mar-09, at 1:53 AM, Chetan Thapliyal wrote:
>
> There are other applications also (not mentioned as open source) that have
>> been listed as freeware. So what's the point if some open source application
>> has been mentioned as freeware?
>
> In simple words an open source application can b
Freeware must not be confused with FOSS. Freeware simply means - does
not require payment for use. Which is the case for Audacity.
On 27-Mar-09, at 1:53 AM, Chetan Thapliyal wrote:
There are other applications also (not mentioned as open source)
that have been listed as freeware. So what's t
There are other applications also (not mentioned as open source) that
have been listed as freeware. So what's the point if some open source
application has been mentioned as freeware?
Abhishek Nandakumar wrote:
The description does say free, open source. Freeware is in reference
to price.
On
The description does say free, open source. Freeware is in reference
to price.
On 26-Mar-09, at 11:57 PM, Linux Lingam wrote:
dear all,
am hugely dismayed to note that a company that obviously understands
foss,
adn cleverly uses foss tools to its advantage,
spreads the fud about foss by c
dear all,
am hugely dismayed to note that a company that obviously understands foss,
adn cleverly uses foss tools to its advantage,
spreads the fud about foss by calling it freeware.
here they are calilng 'audacity' freeware, among several dozen examples i found:
http://www.apple.com/downloads/m
10 matches
Mail list logo
