Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail

2006-10-07 Thread Shiv
>i am still wondering why he doesnt put it on CPAN Hi, Isnt there an *extensions* mechanism for Kmail like there is for Thunderbird? You could then submit your application to be included in the extensions for Kmail. catch ya later (Ive gotta UnWire Life!!!) shiv

Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail

2006-10-07 Thread Mithun Bhattacharya
- Original Message From: Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list Sent: Saturday, October 7, 2006 9:23:18 AM Subject: Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail i am still wondering why he doesnt put it o

Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail

2006-10-07 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 07-Oct-06, at 7:39 AM, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote: >> Any particular reason not to go for Sourceforge ? > > It's too small to make a SF project IMO. I would do it as a last > resort (well, sarovar, not sourceforge). What do you think? > > --

Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail

2006-10-07 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 06-Oct-06, at 9:45 PM, Raj Mathur wrote: >> On 05-Oct-06, at 9:26 PM, Raj Mathur wrote: >>> It's too small to make a SF project IMO. I would do it as a last >>> resort (well, sarovar, not sourceforge). What do you think? >> >> why dont you throw some crumbs my way ;-) we would be happy to ho

Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail

2006-10-06 Thread Mithun Bhattacharya
- Original Message From: Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2006 10:56:39 AM Subject: Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail > > Any particular reason not to go for Sourceforge ? It's too small to make a SF project IMO. I

Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail

2006-10-06 Thread Raj Mathur
On Friday 06 October 2006 19:02, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > On 05-Oct-06, at 9:26 PM, Raj Mathur wrote: > > It's too small to make a SF project IMO. I would do it as a last > > resort (well, sarovar, not sourceforge). What do you think? > > why dont you throw some crumbs my way ;-) we would be ha

Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail

2006-10-06 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 05-Oct-06, at 9:26 PM, Raj Mathur wrote: > It's too small to make a SF project IMO. I would do it as a last > resort (well, sarovar, not sourceforge). What do you think? why dont you throw some crumbs my way ;-) we would be happy to host it. -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Associate, NRC-F

Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail

2006-10-06 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 05-Oct-06, at 8:55 PM, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote: > Any particular reason not to go for Sourceforge ? he wants if as a part of kmail -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Associate, NRC-FOSS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ ___ ilugd

Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail

2006-10-05 Thread Raj Mathur
On Thursday 05 October 2006 20:55, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote: > - Original Message > From: Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org > Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2006 11:56:12 PM > Subject: Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail > > On a more serious

Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail

2006-10-05 Thread Mithun Bhattacharya
- Original Message From: Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2006 11:56:12 PM Subject: Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail On a more serious note, if you think this is useful would appreciate advice on where and how to rele

Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail

2006-10-04 Thread Raj Mathur
On Thursday 05 October 2006 10:03, you wrote: > > That is one feature I can't live without, so here's my little > > offering on the altar of FLOSS-because-I-needed-it: kbbdb, a > > minimal BBDB clone for Kmail. > > This is really cool and something I didn't know I urgently needed > until I read you

Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail

2006-09-30 Thread Raj Mathur
Hi Dipankar, On Sunday 01 October 2006 10:52, you wrote: > On Sunday 01 October 2006 10:24, Raj Mathur wrote: > > It isn't very sophisticated, the pop-up confirmation windows can > > get a bit tedious and it can probably be massively improved.  On > > the plus side, I've been using it for the past

Re: [ilugd] BBDB for Kmail

2006-09-30 Thread dipankar das
On Sunday 01 October 2006 10:24, Raj Mathur wrote: > It isn't very sophisticated, the pop-up confirmation windows can get a > bit tedious and it can probably be massively improved.  On the plus > side, I've been using it for the past 3 days without any problems, > you can use it to add contacts fr

[ilugd] BBDB for Kmail

2006-09-30 Thread Raj Mathur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So... switched to Kmail from [X]Emacs + VM.  Things were pretty smooth except for this lack of the Insidious Big Brother Database (the BBDB).  In case you don't know what the BBDB is, here's a bit from the write-up: The Insidious Big Brother Databa