Re: [ilugd] GFDL licence

2007-04-18 Thread Mahesh T. Pai
"Shakthi Kannan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> SInce it was first published on there site can`t they say they hold >> the copyright > > You wrote the article for them, so it is your copyright work. They > just published it in their website under GNU FDL. Well, some publishers ask for assignment

Re: [ilugd] GFDL licence

2007-04-18 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, On 4/18/07, Gaurav Mishra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > GFDL says you have to give proper respect to other`s work by > mentioning them, Yes. > SInce it was first published on there site can`t they > say they hold the copyright You wrote the article for them, so it is your copyright work. T

Re: [ilugd] GFDL licence

2007-04-18 Thread Gaurav Mishra
On 4/18/07, Shakthi Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 4/18/07, Gaurav Mishra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So who is the real owner of the content site or the original creator > > You are the owner. The document is released under GNU FDL. > > > ,mind i haven`t put any GFDL licence no

Re: [ilugd] GFDL licence

2007-04-18 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, On 4/18/07, Gaurav Mishra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So who is the real owner of the content site or the original creator You are the owner. The document is released under GNU FDL. > ,mind i haven`t put any GFDL licence notice or something like that ? The site has. > Now what if i want

[ilugd] GFDL licence

2007-04-18 Thread Gaurav Mishra
HI all, I have a query, Consider i have published some writing on some site , That site says all matter published here are under GFDL licence. So who is the real owner of the content site or the original creator ,mind i haven`t put any GFDL licence notice or something like that ? Now what if i