Re: [ilugd] Openmoko, Symbian, Android

2008-10-06 Thread shantanu goel
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Frederick Noronha [फ़रेदरिक नोरोनया] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any clues on how these compare on mobiles? Particularly Openmoko and > Android? Would the C/C++ thingy be a negative mark for Openmoko? I Actually, as far as I'm concerned, that is a good thing (abilit

Re: [ilugd] Openmoko, Symbian, Android

2008-10-06 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, --- On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Frederick Noronha [फ़रेदरिक नोरोनया] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Would the C/C++ thingy be a negative mark for Openmoko? \-- Python is available: http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Python Also check: http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Wishlist:BuiltInScriptingLangua

Re: [ilugd] Openmoko, Symbian, Android

2008-10-06 Thread Pradeepto Bhattacharya
Hi, On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Frederick Noronha [फ़रेदरिक नोरोनया] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Android? Would the C/C++ thingy be a negative mark for Openmoko? I I don't understand that question. And what C/C++ thingy? Cheers! Pradeepto -- The KDE Project : http://www.k

[ilugd] Openmoko, Symbian, Android

2008-10-06 Thread Frederick Noronha [फ़र ेदरिक नोर ोनया]
Any clues on how these compare on mobiles? Particularly Openmoko and Android? Would the C/C++ thingy be a negative mark for Openmoko? I understand there are license issues too (Symbian isn't 'yet' open source, and Android is in Google's grip). But how does this reflect when it comes to the user's i