Re: [ilugd] Phillips webcam driver removed from kernel

2004-08-28 Thread Raj Mathur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "Sandip" == Sandip Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sandip> [snip] Sandip> My motorola c650 has the same hardware interface as Sandip> yours. The worst thing about motorola is that, leave alone Sandip> linux, even for wi

Re: [ilugd] Phillips webcam driver removed from kernel

2004-08-28 Thread Sandip Bhattacharya
On Saturday 28 Aug 2004 10:16 am, Raj Mathur wrote: > - Do non-free drivers make sense in the kernel? Given the choice > between a non-free driver in the kernel and not being able to use > (some features of) a device, which would you rather choose? > > [My answer: the latter. For instance, I don'

[ilugd] Phillips webcam driver removed from kernel

2004-08-27 Thread Raj Mathur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I don't know if any of you have been following the Phillips webcam driver in kernel debate over the past couple of days? Basically what has happened is that: a. Nemosoft Unv had an NDA with Phillips that allowed them to make drivers for the Phillips