>
> Hi all,
> First of all thnx to '' Wah Java " for his analysis.
> Although I do have some ideas which may work in making the connection
> better but I've another query. While trying to update ubuntu I found
> tht it's around 187 MB download. which would take quite a bit of
> bandw
naah.. this mail isn't commercial yet..
shhh.. no ads are blocked
damn google
On 7/26/06, Ramnarayan. K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/25/06, Shirish Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > First of all thnx to '' Wah Java " for his analysis.
> > > Although I do h
> On 7/25/06, Shirish Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > First of all thnx to '' Wah Java " for his analysis.
> > Although I do have some ideas which may work in making the connection
> > better but I've another query. While trying to update ubuntu I found
> >
> etc et
On 7/25/06, Shirish Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> First of all thnx to '' Wah Java " for his analysis.
> Although I do have some ideas which may work in making the connection
> better but I've another query. While trying to update ubuntu I found
>
etc etc
>
Hi all,
First of all thnx to '' Wah Java " for his analysis.
Although I do have some ideas which may work in making the connection
better but I've another query. While trying to update ubuntu I found
tht it's around 187 MB download. which would take quite a bit of
bandwidth of th
