On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 14:13, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
> Kapil Sethi wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Here is one more candidate for hall of shame.
> >
> > 1. http://ttsvisas.com
[SNIP]
> Seems to be a private agent for visa processing. So cant be included
> according to *present* conditions at http
Kapil Sethi wrote:
Hi All,
Here is one more candidate for hall of shame.
1. http://ttsvisas.com
The Site is for making appointments with US Counsolate for Visas.
The homepage works well with Firefox, however the pages, which tell you
the availability on a calender shows contents well with IE only.
Hi All,
Here is one more candidate for hall of shame.
1. http://ttsvisas.com
The Site is for making appointments with US Counsolate for Visas.
The homepage works well with Firefox, however the pages, which tell you
the availability on a calender shows contents well with IE only.
I have the screen
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 20:58, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
> chance to icicidirect.com yet to respond to the complaint. Sudev, have you
> filed a complaint yet to icicidirect.com yet, using their feedback form? I
> think you should send one, wait for seven days, and then it should be put
> up the s
Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
I think we should have a policy for two kinds of "offenses".
I have tried to setup a policy[1] for the HallofShame page, and have
removed icicidirect.com from the list for the time being .. in accordance
with the policy.
[1] http://www.lug-delhi.org/HallOfShame
- Sandi
Ajay wrote:
As I am a newbie, excuse my interruption. I believe good newspapers have a technique for
>dealing with this. They tell the suspected fault to the blamed party and
ask him to reply
> in a couple of days. If he does not give a satisfactory reply soon, the
newspapers
> publish the defec
