> > where is the proof that SCO's close sourse didn't
came from open source Linux code.
>
> There isn't. So? Are you saying that it came from
> Linux? Or just
> bad-mouthing SCO?
I dare not. No bad mouthing. Just a thought. But dont
u think it may be a possibility. Infact Facts comes
out of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:27:51PM +0800, Sanjeev Ghane Gupta wrote:
Sanjeev>On Monday, July 28, 2003 9:21 PM [GMT+0800=SGT],
Sanjeev>You may get away with lower damages paid to SCO, but you are still
Sanjeev>guilty.
Yes true, but wont the fact
> what FSF or somebody like that can do at the moment is
> "SUE SCO Over adopting unethical practicies", either
> show us trouble code immediately or pay to FSF".
I really do not understand why the FSF needs to sue SCO.
What unethical practice? They think they own the Unix
Code Base, so they sued
On Monday, July 28, 2003 6:27 PM [GMT+0800=SGT],
puneet goel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> where is the proof that SCO's close sourse didn't came
> from open source Linux code.
There isn't. So? Are you saying that it came from Linux? Or just
bad-mouthing SCO?
> to me SCO seems to be a frontend
> > Even if its true that IBM copied SCO's SMP code
> > into linux its just a matter of time before that
> > code is scraped and someone writes something else.
> >
> Yes, but that does not take away liability for past
> offences. This is like saying "If SCO catches me
> stealing, I can always
On Monday, July 28, 2003 9:21 PM [GMT+0800=SGT],
Spoonman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As of now SCO is only targeting distributors of linux.
> And they have a problem only with the SMP part of the
> kernel.
>
> Normal users running non-SMP boxes should not be affected
> anyway I guess.
You guess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:40:12AM +0530, LinuxLingam wrote:
LinuxLingam>meanwhile, back to SCO, any bets on when they are going to lower their
LinuxLingam>gunsights from enterprise to govt, education, corporates, SOHO,
LinuxLingam>professionals, end
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "LL" == linuxlingam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LL> [snip]
LL> meanwhile, back to SCO, any bets on when they are going to
LL> lower their gunsights from enterprise to govt, education,
LL> corporates, SOHO, professionals, endu-u
>
> SCO wants licensing fees from corporate Linux users
>
uh!!! anyone has some *bsd cds, please?
[just kidding]
but seriously, exchanging some emails with the moderator on the TRON website,
and he shared with me that TRON's license is like *bsd. wonder if that is the
reason why it has ga
