hi
i wish to unsubscribe from the group.
Ankur
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 vivek khurana wrote :
>Hi!
> Thanks for the help on dual licencing, but now i have
>a new doubt. Can i download the binaries of a GPL
>project and use them for inhouse development??
> For example can i use the Qt designer shipped
From: "vivek khurana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks for the help on dual licencing, but now i have
> a new doubt. Can i download the binaries of a GPL
> project and use them for inhouse development??
Qoting from GPL text itself (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html) :
"Activities other than cop
Hi!
Thanks for the help on dual licencing, but now i have
a new doubt. Can i download the binaries of a GPL
project and use them for inhouse development??
For example can i use the Qt designer shipped with
Rh9.0 for inhouse development without paying an fees
to Troltech
bye
vivek
=
Maling f
> Hi!
> Thanks for explaining the dual licencing.
>
>
> > Since my company offers a product with a GPL/MySQL
> > type dual licensing too,
> > I can explain the rationale quite easily :
> Kindly can you give me the name of the company and
> the product.
>
> bye
> vivek
Sure.
The company I work fo
Hi!
Thanks for explaining the dual licencing.
--- abhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since my company offers a product with a GPL/MySQL
> type dual licensing too,
> I can explain the rationale quite easily :
Kindly can you give me the name of the company and
the product.
bye
vivek
=
Maling
> I think even MySQL comes with this type of license. It
> is (to me) difficult to understand the thinking behind
> this scheme.
Since my company offers a product with a GPL/MySQL type dual licensing too,
I can explain the rationale quite easily :
If you are using our product to help others and n
Prashant Verma wrote:
Some rambling thoughts: If the intention is to promote
open source, then it doens't make sense to make the
code available under any license other than GPL. If
the intent is to earn good karma through open
sourcing/GPL and also make the product financially
viable by selling to
> It is under both - a dual licence. You can use it
> even for commercial
> products as long as the end product is open source
> and under GPL.
> However, if your company doesnt want to give the
> source code to its
> customers or otherwise wants to place the end
> product under more
> restrict
vivek khurana wrote:
Hi! Everyone
I have a confusion regarding licencing of Qt
designer.
A copy of Qt designer is shipped with Redhat 9.0. The
About dialog this copy says it is under GPL, whereas
the website of Trolltech(company which made Qt) says
Qt is made available under comercial licence.
